Cheryl Grimmer family gives NSW Premier deadline for independent audit of cold case

Family accuses DPP of 'catastrophic failure' after review upholds discontinued prosecution

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
The family of three-year-old Cheryl Grimmer, who disappeared from a Wollongong beach in 1970, has given NSW Premier Chris Minns and Attorney-General Michael Daley a September 29 deadline to order an independent audit of the 56-year-old cold case, warning they will seek government records through supportive members of the Legislative Council if the government does not respond.

In a letter sent on September 22, the family accused the state's Director of Public Prosecutions, Sally Dowling, of a "catastrophic failure of public accountability" after she upheld the decision to discontinue a murder prosecution against the man known by the pseudonym "Mercury". The family said it refused to "roll over or accept bureaucratic brush-offs".

Cheryl Grimmer was abducted from outside a shower block at Fairy Meadow Beach in January 1970. Her body has never been found. In 1971, a 17-year-old boy confessed to police that he had taken and killed her, but investigators did not believe they had enough evidence to charge him at the time.

Detectives revisited the confession decades later, and Mercury was charged with murder in 2017. He pleaded not guilty. The prosecution was discontinued in 2019 after a judge ruled the 1971 police interview could not be used as evidence, citing a child protection law introduced in 1987 and the vulnerability of the suspect at the time of questioning. Prosecutors said the case could not proceed without the interview.

Earlier this year, the family secured a review by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions and provided 54 submissions. On September 16, Ms Dowling upheld the discontinuation, finding it was not reasonably open to challenge the court's exclusion of the interview.

The family says the review failed to address its legal arguments and information about potential witnesses, and did not explain how the public interest in prosecuting the case was weighed. The Office of the DPP said in a statement that the review considered the evidence, the law, the trial judge's reasons and the family's submissions, and concluded the decision to discontinue was correct. The office acknowledged the outcome was "deeply disappointing" for the family.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case highlights tensions between prosecutorial discretion and the rights of victims' families to seek accountability in historic child homicide cases.
  • The September 29 deadline could lead to a political confrontation if the government does not act, potentially forcing the release of government records through parliamentary processes.
  • The outcome may set a precedent for how cold cases involving confessions obtained under past legal standards are handled.

Background

Cheryl Grimmer's disappearance in 1970 is one of Australia's most enduring cold cases. A 17-year-old boy confessed to the murder in 1971 but was never charged at the time. In 2017, following a cold case review, he was charged with murder. In 2019, a judge ruled the confession inadmissible because a child protection law passed in 1987 applied retrospectively, and because the questioning was unfair under the Evidence Act. Prosecutors then dropped the case. The family has since pursued multiple avenues to have the decision overturned.

Key Perspectives

Cheryl Grimmer's family: They argue the DPP's review was inadequate, failing to properly weigh the public interest in a trial or consider new evidence about witnesses. They want an independent audit to examine the decision-making process.

Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP): Maintains the review was thorough, considered all relevant evidence and submissions, and correctly concluded the case could not succeed after the confession was excluded.

Legal system observers: The case underscores the difficulty of prosecuting historic crimes when legal standards for evidence and child protections have changed, potentially leaving families without a trial even when a confession exists.

What to Watch

  • Whether Premier Minns or Attorney-General Daley respond to the letter before September 29.
  • Whether the family follows through on seeking government records through the Legislative Council, and what those records might reveal.
  • Any further legal or political moves by the family, including potential challenges to the DPP's decision in court.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.