Coding harnesses change token costs more reliably than success rates

Across three production harnesses, pass-rate differences largely resembled rerun noise, while per-task costs varied by up to threefold.

Academic
Yangze Liu · Zhongyi Han

Shandong University

Research Digest··2 min read
Liu and Han held language models fixed while comparing Claude Code, mini-SWE-agent and OpenCode on SWE-bench Verified, a benchmark of real repository repair tasks.

The authors ran five models through three pinned production harnesses on 45 tasks from the two hardest SWE-bench Verified difficulty bands.

Why this paper

From Shandong University

In one line

Swapping a coding agent's harness moves pass rate no more than rerunning the same harness.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors (3 noted)
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.