Complainant H testifies Alan Jones touched his bottom, felt 'disgusting and powerless'

Fourth of five complainants gives evidence in indecent assault trial

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources4 outlets
The criminal trial of broadcaster Alan Jones has heard from a fourth male complainant, who told the court he felt 'disgusting and powerless' after the former radio host allegedly touched his bottom at an event more than five years ago.

Complainant H, an executive decades younger than Jones, began giving evidence in the NSW Local Court on Tuesday. Jones, 85, faces 21 counts of indecent assault and sexual touching and has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The man testified that he met Jones for the first time at an event, where the former broadcaster allegedly 'placed his hand on the top of my back and went slowly down my back and then rested it on my bottom'. He said he did not react at the time because he 'didn't want to cause a scene' and thought confronting Jones 'could potentially ruin the night'.

Complainant H told the court he recounted the incident to his boss as he was leaving the event, and she was 'angry' and made him feel supported. He also shared the experience with a second colleague a couple of days later, telling him: 'I felt disgusting and powerless and that's really the first time I've understood what women have been going through for all these years.'

Jones has been charged with one count of sexual touching in relation to the alleged incident. The executive also gave evidence about how his allegations became public. He said that in 2023 he saw an article in the Sydney Morning Herald containing allegations about Jones and contacted the journalist, Kate McClymont. He told the court he did not give permission for his story to be published, but in May 2024 a second article appeared that included his allegations without naming him. Asked by prosecutor Georgina Wright SC whether he authorised publication, the man said he did not, and confirmed he was upset about it.

The trial continues.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The trial is a high-profile criminal proceeding against one of Australia's most recognisable media figures, drawing significant public attention.
  • Complainant H's testimony highlights the psychological impact of alleged sexual misconduct and the difficulty victims face in speaking out, especially in public settings.
  • The fact that the complainant contacted a journalist before charges were filed, and was reportedly upset by the resulting publication, raises questions about privacy and media ethics in sexual assault reporting.

Background

Alan Jones is a former radio broadcaster who for decades hosted a popular morning show on Sydney's 2GB. He was charged in late 2024 with multiple counts of indecent assault and sexual touching involving five male complainants, with alleged incidents spanning several years. Jones has consistently denied all allegations. The trial, being heard in the NSW Local Court, has already seen one charge dropped earlier this week.

Key Perspectives

Complainants and their legal team: The prosecution, led by Georgina Wright SC, is presenting evidence from five men who allege Jones indecently assaulted them. Complainant H's testimony is the fourth in the sequence, and his account echoes others in describing unwanted touching at events where Jones was a guest. Alan Jones and the defence: Jones has pleaded not guilty to all charges. His legal team is expected to cross-examine each complainant, challenging the accuracy and context of their recollections. No defence evidence has been presented yet. Media and privacy observers: The complainant's distress over the publication of his allegations without explicit permission underscores ongoing tensions between reporting on sexual misconduct and protecting victim privacy, even when complainants initially approach journalists.

What to Watch

  • Cross-examination of Complainant H, which could reveal inconsistencies or strengthen his account.
  • Whether the remaining two complainants (Complainants I and J) will give evidence as scheduled.
  • The potential for further charges to be dropped or added as the trial proceeds.
  • A verdict or potential mistrial if the defence successfully raises procedural issues.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.