Corruption watchdog ‘piqued’ by Labor’s invite-only grants as Albanese defends ‘dirt file’ on MP

Acting NACC commissioner says aspects of grant program warrant attention, but no determination yet

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources4 outlets
The acting head of Australia’s corruption watchdog says Labor’s invite-only election grant program has “piqued” her interest, as a Senate inquiry grills departmental staff and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese defends his office’s dissemination of a “dirt file” about independent MP Helen Haines.

Acting National Anti-Corruption Commissioner Kylie Kilgour told a Senate inquiry on Thursday that it was “impossible” to express an opinion on whether corrupt conduct had occurred in the program, but that several aspects, including alterations to its constitutionality, had “piqued” her interest. She said the commission would not make a determination unless it conducted a thorough, proper investigation under the NACC Act.

Kilgour also expressed support for Haines, who was critically injured in a violent car attack on Monday and has had both legs amputated. Haines, the independent MP for the regional Victorian seat of Indi, was a vocal critic of the grant program and campaigned to establish the NACC. Kilgour became emotional reading the commission’s opening statement, describing Haines as “instrumental” in the NACC’s creation and saying she had sent a message of support to her office.

The inquiry is examining the $560.9 million Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program, under which nearly three-quarters of grants went to notionally Labor-held or competitive seats, according to analysis by the Centre for Public Integrity. The Marrickville Golf Club, in Albanese’s electorate of Grayndler, has been a focus: it had already received five federal grants totalling almost $58,000 before Albanese promised it $6 million during the 2025 election campaign.

Constitutional expert Anne Twomey, in a submission to the inquiry, called the program “grey corruption” and “the misuse of public money”. She wrote that politically directed grants were “not about being a good local member”. Concerns were raised that the original program design, released in September 2025, was constitutionally invalid because the Commonwealth cannot directly fund local sporting and community facilities. Guidelines republished on October 2, 2025, were changed so grants could flow through state or local governments under section 96 of the Constitution.

Kilgour said she had not yet heard evidence that would place the program under NACC jurisdiction and would defer to a potential investigation by the Australian National Audit Office.

The inquiry continues, with dozens of senators’ questions to the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet deferred, including which ministers allocated grant funding, details of the Marrickville Golf Club funding, and the administration of the ministerial code of conduct regarding conflicts of interest.

Separately, Albanese faced questioning over a five-page background file distributed by his media office to federal political journalists in September, encouraging scrutiny of whether $1.8 billion worth of funding requests by Haines’ office represented value for money. The file suggested questions about Haines’ due diligence and potential conflicts of interest.

At the time, Haines responded: “The issue isn’t whether MPs advocate for their communities. Of course, we do. What I’m asking for is that all communities get a fair go.”

Asked on Wednesday whether he was aware of or ordered the file’s release, Albanese called Haines “a very strong advocate for her community”. On Thursday, he told ABC Sydney radio the document was “a list of funding asks … just showing that people of integrity stand up for their electorate. No personal criticism of Helen.”

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The inquiry tests whether election-era grant allocations crossed the line from legitimate pork-barrelling into conduct warranting corruption investigation, with a constitutional expert alleging "grey corruption".
  • The attack on Helen Haines, a key NACC advocate, injects a personal and emotional dimension into a political controversy, prompting rare media attention to a government-distributed background file.
  • The outcome could shape rules for federal community grants and the NACC’s jurisdiction over ministerial decisions.

Background

The Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program is a federal grants scheme announced during the 2025 election campaign. Critics allege it was skewed to Labor-held or marginal seats. After concerns about constitutional validity, the program was redesigned to route funds through state or local governments. The NACC, established partly due to Haines’ campaigning, is an independent body that investigates corruption in federal agencies and MPs. The current inquiry is a Senate investigation, separate from any NACC probe.

Key Perspectives

NACC (Acting Commissioner Kylie Kilgour): Says it is too early to determine if corrupt conduct occurred, but several aspects have piqued her interest. A thorough investigation under the NACC Act would be required before any finding. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese: Defends the grant program and the background file on Haines, insisting it was not personal criticism and that good local members advocate for their communities. Constitutional expert Anne Twomey: Characterises politically directed grants as "grey corruption" and misuse of public money, arguing they are not about being a good local member. Senate inquiry and critics: The inquiry is scrutinising the allocation process, ministerial involvement, and potential conflicts of interest, with questions and evidence still being collected.

What to Watch

  • Whether the NACC decides to launch a formal investigation, or refers matters to the Australian National Audit Office.
  • The Senate inquiry’s findings and any recommendations for changes to grant guidelines or ministerial accountability.
  • The recovery of Helen Haines and any impact her absence has on the inquiry’s momentum.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 10 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedLabor’s invite-only election grant program had piqued the acting watchdog chief’s interest.WA Today - Latest News: “Labor’s invite-only election grant program has “piqued” the interest of the acting head of Australia’s corruption watchdog”
  2. SupportedAlbanese defended his office’s dissemination of a “dirt file” about Helen Haines.WA Today - Latest News: “Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been forced to defend a “dirt file” his office disseminated about independent MP Helen Haines”
  3. SupportedThe acting commissioner said aspects of the program warrant attention, but no determination has been made.WA Today - Latest News: “it was “impossible” to express an opinion at this time over whether corrupt conduct had occurred in the grant program, but a number of aspects had “piqued” her interest”
  4. SupportedKilgour said it was “impossible” to express an opinion on whether corrupt conduct had occurred in the program.WA Today - Latest News: “acting NACC commissioner Kylie Kilgour said it was “impossible” to express an opinion at this time over whether corrupt conduct had occurred in the grant program”
  5. SupportedHaines was critically injured in a violent car attack on Monday and had both legs amputated.WA Today - Latest News: “The victim of a violent car attack on Monday, Haines has had both legs amputated and remains in a critical condition.”
  6. Not in the sourcesHaines is the independent MP for the regional Victorian seat of Indi.WA Today - Latest News
  7. SupportedThe program was worth $560.9 million, and nearly three-quarters of its grants went to notionally Labor-held or competitive seats.WA Today - Latest News: “Haines was critical of the Albanese government’s $560.9 million Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program, in which nearly three-quarters of grants were allocated to notionally Labor-held or competitive seats”
  8. SupportedMarrickville Golf Club had received five federal grants totalling almost $58,000 before Albanese promised it a $6 million grant during the 2025 election campaign.WA Today - Latest News: “it had already received five federal grants totalling almost $58,000 before Albanese promised it a $6 million grant through the program during the 2025 election campaign.”
  9. Partly supportedTwomey called the program “grey corruption” and “the misuse of public money”.WA Today - Latest News: ““No, this is not about ‘being a good local member’,” she wrote. “It is about indulging in grey corruption and the misuse of public money at the public’s expense.””
  10. SupportedThe original design was released in September 2025, and guidelines republished on October 2, 2025, allowed grants to flow through state or local governments under section 96.WA Today - Latest News: “guidelines for the grants program were republished on October 2, 2025, but they prompted by concerns that the original design released a month earlier was constitutionally invalid. The Commonwealth does not have the power to directly fund local sporting and community facilities. The scheme was subsequently changed so grants could flow through state or local governments under section 96 of the Constitution.”
  11. SupportedThe five-page file questioned whether $1.8 billion in funding requests by Haines’s office represented value for money.WA Today - Latest News: “the file encourages questioning of Haines over whether “$1.8 billion worth of funding for projects she’s selected” represented value for money.”
  12. SupportedOn Thursday, Albanese told ABC Sydney radio the document was “a list of funding asks … just showing that people of integrity stand up for their electorate. No personal criticism of Helen.”WA Today - Latest News: “Facing further questioning on Thursday morning, Albanese told ABC Sydney radio the document was “a list of funding asks … just showing that people of integrity stand up for their electorate. No personal criticism of Helen”.”

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the World desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source10 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe