Crows evaluate visual information twice as fast as mammals, study finds

Avian brains without a neocortex still outperform primates in rapid decision-making task

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
A new study shows that crows can process visual information at twice the speed of mammals, despite lacking the neocortex that primates rely on for decision-making. The findings challenge assumptions about the neural basis of rapid visual judgment.

The research used a classic random-dot-motion task, in which subjects must determine the direction of a drifting cloud of dots. In primates, neurons in the neocortex accumulate evidence over time until a decision threshold is crossed. But birds do not have a neocortex, leaving neurobiologists puzzled about how they make such decisions.

"This was the big question," said Andreas Nieder, a neurobiologist at the University of Tübingen. "How [would] a differently organized avian brain encode decisions?"

The results suggest that crows achieve faster visual evaluation through an alternative neural architecture, offering new insights into the evolution of cognitive processing.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The discovery shows that rapid decision-making is not exclusive to mammals and can arise from different brain structures.
  • It may inform the design of artificial intelligence systems that need quick visual processing without mimicking the mammalian neocortex.
  • Understanding avian cognition could reshape views on intelligence across species.

Background

Primates rely on a layered neocortex to gather sensory evidence and make decisions. Birds, which diverged from mammals hundreds of millions of years ago, have a pallium that is organized differently but still supports complex behavior. The random-dot-motion task has been a standard tool for studying decision-making in monkeys, but its application to birds was rare until now.

Key Perspectives

Andreas Nieder (University of Tübingen): As the lead researcher, he posed the central question of how avian brains encode decisions without a neocortex. The study's results highlight that evolution can produce equally fast cognitive outcomes through different neural pathways. Implications for neuroscience: The findings open a new line of inquiry into the minimum neural requirements for rapid visual evaluation, potentially influencing both comparative biology and AI research.

What to Watch

  • Whether similar fast visual processing is found in other bird species, such as parrots or corvids.
  • Future studies that map the specific neural circuits in the avian brain responsible for this speed advantage.
  • Potential collaboration between neuroscientists and AI engineers to translate these mechanisms into artificial visual systems.

Sources

Checked

10 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 6 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedCrows evaluate visual information twice as fast as mammals.Ars Technica - All content: “Crows can evaluate visual info twice as fast as mammals.”
  2. Partly supportedCrows outperform primates in a rapid decision-making task.Ars Technica - All content: “Crows can evaluate visual info twice as fast as mammals. Much of what we know about how a brain makes decisions comes from studying monkeys watching dots.”
  3. SupportedCrows can process visual information at twice the speed of mammals despite lacking a neocortex used by primates for decision-making.Ars Technica - All content: “Crows can evaluate visual info twice as fast as mammals. ... The task has shown that in the primate neocortex, neurons gather visual evidence over time, with their firing rates climbing until they cross a threshold, when the animal commits to a decision. But avian brains that don’t have a neocortex”
  4. Not in the sourcesThe findings challenge assumptions about the neural basis of rapid visual judgment.
  5. SupportedThe research used a random-dot-motion task in which subjects determine the direction of a drifting cloud of dots.Ars Technica - All content: “in a task known as a random-dot-motion task, a cloud of flickering specks drifts weakly in one direction while the subject tries to determine whether—and in which direction— it’s moving.”
  6. SupportedIn primates, neocortical neurons accumulate visual evidence until they cross a decision threshold.Ars Technica - All content: “in the primate neocortex, neurons gather visual evidence over time, with their firing rates climbing until they cross a threshold, when the animal commits to a decision.”
  7. Partly supportedBirds lack a neocortex, leaving neurobiologists puzzled about how they make such decisions.Ars Technica - All content: “But avian brains that don’t have a neocortex, so it wasn’t obvious how they made similar decisions.”
  8. SupportedAndreas Nieder said, “This was the big question.”Ars Technica - All content: ““This was the big question,” said Andreas Nieder, a neurobiologist at the University of Tübingen.”
  9. SupportedAndreas Nieder said, “How [would] a differently organized avian brain encode decisions?”Ars Technica - All content: ““How [would] a differently organized avian brain encode decisions?””
  10. Not in the sourcesCrows achieve faster visual evaluation through an alternative neural architecture, offering new insights into the evolution of cognitive processing.

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the Science desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub. Plate by Ollie Flash, picture desk.

1 source6 of 10 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe