Sunday 4 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Australia

Deputy Chief Judge sues judicial watchdog over bullying complaint handling

Sharon Freund seeks to overturn commission's adverse findings after complaint against Chief Judge Michael Allen dismissed

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Deputy Chief Judge of the NSW Local Court, Sharon Freund, has launched legal proceedings in the Court of Appeal, challenging two decisions by the Judicial Commission of NSW after it dismissed her bullying complaint against Chief Judge Michael Allen and made adverse findings against her.

Local Court Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund has filed proceedings in the NSW Court of Appeal, according to a court document filed by her lawyer. The action challenges two decisions of the Judicial Commission of NSW, the state's judicial watchdog.

The document states that Freund lodged a complaint in May of this year against Chief Judge Michael Allen, alleging he had engaged in bullying conduct towards her. The Judicial Commission determined in June that the complaint was not substantiated and dismissed it summarily.

In addition to dismissing the complaint, the commission made adverse findings about Freund. The judicial commission minutes recorded that "a number of the members of the commission were of the view that the complaint had not been brought in good faith", according to the court filing.

Freund is now seeking to overturn both the dismissal and the adverse findings. The case represents a rare instance of a senior judge taking legal action against the body responsible for overseeing judicial conduct. No response from the Judicial Commission or Chief Judge Allen has been reported in the court documents.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case raises questions about the effectiveness and impartiality of the Judicial Commission in handling internal complaints within the judiciary.
  • It could set a precedent for how disputes between senior judges and the watchdog are resolved, potentially affecting judicial accountability processes.
  • The outcome may influence public confidence in the independence of the NSW judicial system.

Background

This is a dispute within the highest ranks of the NSW Local Court. The Judicial Commission of NSW is the independent body that investigates complaints about judicial officers. Internal tensions within the judiciary are rarely aired in open court, making this legal action unusual. The case involves a deputy chief judge directly challenging the commission's findings after she complained about the chief judge.

Key Perspectives

Deputy Chief Judge Sharon Freund: She contends the commission unfairly dismissed her complaint and made adverse findings that were unjustified, allegedly going beyond its role by questioning her good faith. Judicial Commission of NSW: The commission found the bullying complaint unsubstantiated and recorded that some members believed it was not made in good faith, leading to its summary dismissal. Legal observers: Court watchers note the significance of a judicial officer using the Court of Appeal to challenge the watchdog's decisions, potentially testing the boundaries of the commission's powers.

What to Watch

  • The Court of Appeal's decision on whether to hear the case or strike it out.
  • Any further details emerging from the court documents about the alleged bullying conduct.
  • The broader reaction from the NSW legal community and any calls for reform of the complaint process.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workReport an errorSubscribe