Drax datacentre plan could nearly double Gatwick's annual flight emissions, analysis finds

NRDC estimates biomass-powered facility would burn 4.9m tonnes of wood a year to serve AI demand

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A planned datacentre at Drax's North Yorkshire biomass power station could produce nearly double the annual carbon emissions of all flights out of Gatwick airport, according to an analysis by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The campaign group estimates the 1.2GW facility, designed to serve growing AI demand, would burn 4.9 million tonnes of wood a year and emit 8.6 million tonnes of CO2 annually.

Plans unveiled by Drax last year would convert part of its biomass plant in North Yorkshire into a datacentre, responding to rising demand for artificial intelligence capability. AI datacentres use large amounts of electricity to power servers, cooling equipment and facility systems. Across the UK, 315 datacentres are queued to connect to the electricity grid, representing 73GW of demand, almost double the country's peak winter energy demand.

In public documents, Drax says it is developing options for a 1.2GW datacentre, with 100MW drawn from the electricity grid and the remainder supplied by its own power station. The plant currently burns millions of tonnes of imported wood to create energy, a method the company has touted as clean and capable of delivering "negative emissions", on the basis that replacement forests absorb CO2 as they grow. Scientists and environmental experts strongly contest this accounting approach, with researchers finding such systems could take 150 years to become carbon negative.

The NRDC estimate, based on information in Drax's 2025 annual report, assumes the datacentre would burn 4.9 million tonnes of wood a year while running at a constant rate for all hours of the year, producing total emissions of 8.6 million tonnes of CO2. That is nearly double the 4.79 million tonnes of CO2 emitted by all flights from Gatwick airport in 2024.

Matt Williams, a senior advocate at NRDC, said this would make it "one of the dirtiest datacentres out there". Oliver Hayes, head of policy at the campaign group Global Action Plan, said: "Burning millions of trees to power server farms is indefensible."

The datacentre has not yet entered the formal planning process, but Drax said it could be fully operational from 2031 if it secured the necessary consents. Williams said the government must "urgently set minimum standards for datacentres and rule out dirty energy generation like burning trees".

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • AI demand is driving a wave of datacentre proposals: 315 are waiting to connect to the UK grid, representing nearly double the country's peak winter electricity demand.
  • The Drax proposal highlights a tension between accelerating AI infrastructure and climate targets: one facility could nearly match the annual emissions of a major international airport.
  • The dispute over biomass carbon accounting could shape how datacentre energy use is counted and regulated, in the UK and internationally.

Background

Drax converted its North Yorkshire plant from coal to burning biomass, largely imported wood pellets, and has long positioned the fuel as a renewable, low carbon energy source. The method's climate credentials rest on the assumption that CO2 released by burning wood is reabsorbed by newly planted forests, but scientists say that payback can take well over a century, meaning burning wood can be worse for the climate than fossil gas in the near term. AI datacentres' heavy electricity demand is meanwhile reshaping energy planning in many countries.

Key Perspectives

Drax: Positions biomass as a clean energy source that can deliver negative emissions, and says it is developing the datacentre in response to AI demand. The company says the facility could be fully operational from 2031 if consents are secured.

Scientists and environmental experts: Contest the negative emissions accounting, with research suggesting biomass systems could take 150 years to become carbon negative.

Campaign groups: NRDC and Global Action Plan describe the proposal as one of the dirtiest datacentres and argue the government should set minimum standards for datacentres and exclude burning trees from their energy supply.

What to Watch

  • Whether the project enters the formal UK planning process, which it has not yet done.
  • Any government moves to set minimum standards for datacentre energy sources, which NRDC is demanding.
  • How the 73GW of queued datacentre demand is handled by UK energy planners as grid connections are processed.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.