El Salvador mass trials ‘a mockery of justice’, Human Rights Watch finds

Report details due process violations, vague charges in hearings that try hundreds together

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Human Rights Watch has released a report documenting widespread due process violations in El Salvador’s mass trials, where hundreds of people are tried and convicted together under vaguely defined gang-related charges. The report, which reviewed four indictments covering more than 600 defendants and a single court ruling involving over 120 people, concludes that the hearings are designed to produce guilty verdicts rather than weigh evidence.

The report, published on Wednesday, includes interviews with 15 defence lawyers who said their clients were denied basic due process rights, including restricted access to case files and the ability to communicate privately with counsel. In many cases, the only evidence linking defendants to gangs came from one of two anonymous witnesses who received immunity from prosecution.

“El Salvador’s mass trials are a mockery of justice,” said Juanita Goebertus, Americas director at Human Rights Watch, in a statement. “These hearings are designed to produce guilty verdicts, not to weigh evidence under due process.”

The mass trials are part of President Nayib Bukele’s sweeping security crackdown, launched after a state of emergency was declared in March 2022 in response to a surge in organised crime. More than 93,000 people, including over 3,000 children, have been detained under the emergency order, which has been renewed multiple times. An estimated 120,000 people are currently imprisoned in El Salvador, about 2 percent of the population – one of the highest incarceration rates in the world.

The Salvadoran government has defended the trials as necessary to dismantle gangs at scale. Bukele has acknowledged that innocent people have been swept up, saying in 2024 that some 8,000 arrested people were later released. “We are going to free 100 percent of the innocent people,” he pledged at the time, arguing no system was perfect.

HRW noted that many convictions rely on the vague charge of being a “collaborator” with gangs. In one trial reviewed by the group, more than 120 people were convicted of unlawful association and sentenced to 30 or 45 years in prison; none were acquitted.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The report highlights how mass trials undermine the right to a fair trial, affecting thousands of defendants in El Salvador.
  • More than 93,000 people have been detained since 2022, including children, raising concerns about arbitrary imprisonment on a national scale.
  • The findings could increase international pressure on the Bukele government over its human rights record, even as the crackdown remains popular domestically.

Background

El Salvador has been under a state of emergency since March 2022, when President Nayib Bukele launched a sweeping security crackdown to combat a surge in gang violence. The government suspended certain civil liberties and granted law enforcement broad powers, leading to mass arrests. In 2023, Congress passed legislation allowing mass trials, enabling courts to handle cases involving hundreds of defendants together. The crackdown has sharply reduced homicide rates but drawn repeated criticism from human rights organisations over due process violations and unlawful detention.

Key Perspectives

[Human Rights Watch and defence lawyers]: The mass trials violate basic due process, with defendants facing vague charges, weak evidence, and restrictions on legal representation. The system is designed to convict, not to weigh evidence fairly. [Salvadoran government]: The trials are a necessary tool to dismantle powerful gangs and restore public safety, given the unprecedented scale of organised crime. The government argues that no system is perfect and that innocent detainees will be released. [Critics and human rights advocates]: The crackdown amounts to mass incarceration without adequate legal safeguards, leading to potentially tens of thousands of wrongful convictions. The use of anonymous witnesses and the absence of acquittals in reviewed cases suggest systemic abuse.

What to Watch

  • Whether the state of emergency, which has been repeatedly renewed, continues to be extended.
  • The number of prisoners later released as “innocent” and any changes to trial procedures.
  • International responses, including potential sanctions or statements from organisations such as the United Nations or the Organisation of American States.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.