Energy secretary appears to criticise UK migration settlement proposals in now-deleted post

Miatta Fahnbulleh said prolonging wait for settlement could delay integration, but later withdrew remarks as paraphrased

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
UK Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh has appeared to criticise the government's proposed migration policy extending settlement periods, suggesting in a now-deleted constituency website post that longer waits could delay integration. Fahnbulleh's office said the remarks were paraphrased and would be rewritten, as cabinet tensions over the proposals continue.

Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh has been drawn into a cabinet dispute over migration policy after a post on her constituency website appeared to criticise the government's plans to extend the qualifying period for settlement.

The post, which has since been deleted, summarised remarks Fahnbulleh made at a community meeting in her Peckham constituency in September. According to the write-up, first reported by the Telegraph, Fahnbulleh said: "If we continually prolong the time people have to wait for settlement, we can also prolong the process of building cohesion."

Her office said the remarks had been paraphrased and did not accurately represent her views. The post would be rewritten to reflect what she actually told residents.

The government has proposed increasing the standard qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain from five years to 10, with concessions possible for some professions including care workers. The pathway to permanent settlement for refugees would be extended to up to 20 years, with reviews every 30 months. The final response to a consultation on the proposals has not yet been published, but Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said he is committed to the bulk of the changes.

Tensions over the policy have already surfaced. Last month, Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said the proposed changes, if left unamended, would unfairly penalise care staff who had "moved their lives here to look after our loved ones".

Fahnbulleh, who came to the UK as a child after fleeing the civil war in Liberia, told the Guardian's Politics Weekly podcast last month that her family would have found the changes "tough". She said she wanted the government to recognise migrants' contributions, adding: "I think we ultimately need to get to an immigration system that has control … but actually then recognises the contribution that people have made."

In her address to Peckham constituents, Fahnbulleh said the debate had become "increasingly depressing and toxic" and called for "a more compassionate immigration system". She said: "The asylum process is broken and needs reform. Ultimately, I want to see a system based on control and compassion, with a much stronger focus on integration."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Cabinet ministers publicly questioning a major policy proposal increases pressure on the government to amend or delay the changes.
  • The policy would affect hundreds of thousands of migrants and refugees already in the UK, as well as future applicants.
  • The dispute highlights internal Labour divisions over immigration, a politically sensitive issue ahead of the next general election.

Background

The government's proposed changes would extend the standard qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years, and for refugees from five to up to 20 years. The policy has been subject to a consultation, the final response to which has not yet been published. Prime Minister Andy Burnham has backed the bulk of the changes. The proposals have drawn criticism from within the party, with Housing Secretary Angela Rayner previously warning they could unfairly penalise care workers. Migration policy remains a contentious issue in British politics, and the government is seeking to balance control with economic and social needs.

Key Perspectives

Miatta Fahnbulleh (Energy Secretary): She has argued for a more compassionate and integration-focused immigration system. While she supports control, she believes prolonged settlement periods could hinder community cohesion. She has personal experience as a refugee, which informs her view.

Shabana Mahmood (Justice Secretary and architect of the policy): The policy is designed to tighten settlement rules and ensure long-term integration. Mahmood is believed to be considering concessions for certain groups, including care workers.

Critics within the Labour Party: Angela Rayner and others have raised concerns that the changes could unfairly penalise workers who have come to the UK to fill shortages, particularly in care. They argue for a more nuanced approach that recognises contributions.

What to Watch

  • The government's final response to the consultation, expected to clarify whether concessions will be made and for which groups.
  • Any further public comments from cabinet members, which could signal the depth of internal opposition.
  • The potential impact on Labour's standing with diaspora communities and voters concerned about immigration.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by June Katz on the World desk. Read for legal risk by Marcus Hale, legal. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 sourcefirst published 20 Oct, 4:45 am
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe