Expert tells NSW panel Lue school should be moved if Bowdens silver mine approved

Three-day IPC hearing in Mudgee hears most community speakers oppose the 23-year silver, lead and zinc project

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
A scientist has told the NSW Independent Planning Commission that a public school near the proposed Bowdens silver and lead mine should be relocated, warning the project poses an unacceptable lead exposure risk to children.

The NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC) has been told a public school should be moved if a proposed silver and lead mine is approved, amid fears it could poison children.

The IPC heard three days of evidence this week in Mudgee as it reassessed a proposal to extract 30 million tonnes of silver, lead and zinc over 23 years near the small town of Lue.

University of Queensland professor and principal research fellow at the Sustainable Minerals Institute Barry Noller told the hearing the project's potential for lead exposure posed an unacceptable risk to children at Lue Public School, about two kilometres from the mine site.

"I recommend that the Lue school, being at the boundary of dust deposition of [the] Bowdens mining project, be moved," Professor Noller said. "The management plan would be underestimating the true quantity of deposited lead that is relevant in terms of assessing the risk to adults and particularly children."

The project has divided the community. Almost 100 people spoke at the hearing, with the majority opposed to the mine and only a few non-employees speaking in support. On Wednesday, farmers rode tractors and utes from Lue into Mudgee as part of a protest action.

Proponent Silver Mines Limited's managing director Jo Battershill implored the panel to approve the development.

"The project would provide investment and economic diversification for the mid-western region," he said.

Mr Battershill told the IPC that while the concern was understandable, the project had undergone extensive independent review. "Predicted health risks from the project, including from lead, are very low," he said.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The outcome determines whether Lue Public School, two kilometres from the proposed mine site, operates next to a 23-year silver, lead and zinc operation.
  • The reassessment is a test of how NSW balances mining investment and economic diversification against health and environmental concerns in regional communities.
  • The decision could shape how lead dust deposition is modelled and regulated in future mining approvals across Australia.

Background

The Bowdens project is a silver, lead and zinc development near the small town of Lue in the Central West of NSW. The Independent Planning Commission, the state body that assesses major projects, has been re-examining the proposal and heard three days of evidence this week in nearby Mudgee. The community is visibly split, with farmers staging a tractor and ute protest from Lue to Mudgee on Wednesday and only a handful of non-employee residents speaking in support.

Key Perspectives

Silver Mines Limited: The proponent argues the mine would bring investment and economic diversification to the mid-western region. Managing director Jo Battershill told the panel the project had undergone extensive independent review and predicted health risks, including from lead, were very low. Lue residents and farmers: The majority of the almost 100 people who addressed the hearing oppose the project, citing environmental and health concerns. Farmers protested on Wednesday by riding tractors and utes from Lue into Mudgee. Professor Barry Noller: The University of Queensland expert told the hearing the lead exposure risk to children was unacceptable, recommended the Lue school be moved and said the project's management plan underestimated deposited lead.

What to Watch

  • The IPC's final determination on the Bowdens proposal and any conditions it attaches to dust and lead management.
  • Whether the school relocation recommendation is taken up by the panel or the NSW government.
  • How the proponent responds to the expert evidence on lead deposition if the project is approved with additional conditions.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe