Farage denies Reform UK would use lethal force against Channel boats after MP's remarks

Robert Jenrick said Royal Marines should be able to open fire; defence minister calls comments 'disgusting and illegal'

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Nigel Farage has denied that a Reform UK government would authorise lethal force against migrant crossings in the Channel, hours after one of his MPs said the Royal Marines should be permitted to fire on the boats.

In an interview with TalkTV, Robert Jenrick, a Reform UK MP who defected from the Conservatives, said the party would deploy the Royal Marines to take boats back to France. "What we are going to do, and we're the only political party that has the courage to say this, is deploy the Royal Marines into the Channel. If they need to use lethal force, then they'll be able to do so," he said.

Speaking on LBC, Farage rejected the suggestion that Reform would authorise routine use of force, saying it would be used only if soldiers were fired at, and that Jenrick was being "utterly misconstrued".

"Anybody wearing British military uniform who gets fired at has the right to respond. That's what he was saying," Farage said. He described the crossings as the work of "very, very serious international criminal organisations" and said a Reform government would "pick these people up and take them back to France". He predicted that "within two weeks of boats being taken back to France, the boats will stop coming."

Jenrick had earlier said allowing the use of force would end the problem "in just a few days", while adding that force was "obviously not what we want to see happen" and that migrants should be "picked up off the boats in a sensible and reasonable way, and taken straight back to France."

Defence minister Luke Pollard condemned the comments as "disgusting and illegal", telling Times Radio that the armed forces could not accept "an illegal order". "We do not shoot unarmed civilians. We do not take military action against civilians," he said. Pollard accused Reform of using the idea as a "soundbite designed to distract from their sleaze and their scandal", saying it was "abhorrent to military values, abhorrent to British values."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The dispute puts Reform UK's migration policy under scrutiny just as the party positions itself for the next election.
  • It raises serious legal and military questions about using armed forces against civilians at sea.
  • Labour is using the remarks to portray Reform as reckless and distracted by internal problems.

Background

The UK has long debated how to respond to small boat crossings of the Channel, with successive governments seeking to deter arrivals and return people to France. Deploying military forces to intercept or turn back boats has been discussed by hardline politicians before, but proposals involving the possible use of lethal force go beyond previous mainstream policy and would raise significant legal and human rights concerns.

Key Perspectives

Nigel Farage and Reform UK: Farage says a Reform government would not authorise routine lethal force, only allow soldiers to respond if fired upon. The party's stated plan is to take boats and migrants back to France. Jenrick argues that allowing force would deter crossings within days. UK government and military leadership: Defence minister Luke Pollard condemns the proposal as illegal and contrary to military and British values. He says orders to act against unarmed civilians would be unlawful and should not be obeyed. Critics and skeptics: The proposal is likely to face legal challenge over the use of military force against unarmed migrants, along with practical concerns about how boats could be safely returned to France and the risk of escalation in the Channel.

What to Watch

  • Whether Reform UK issues an official policy clarification on the use of force.
  • Any response from military chiefs or legal advisers on the legality of the proposal.
  • Further public statements from Jenrick and Farage as the political debate develops.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe