Farmers and miners push back on new workplace dust and chemical exposure limits

Industry groups warn Safe Work Australia rules could disrupt grain harvest and lack practical measurement methods

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
New workplace safety rules set by Safe Work Australia (SWA) that will dramatically reduce accepted exposure levels for hundreds of dusts, fumes and chemicals from December 1 have drawn sharp criticism from farmers and miners in Western Australia, who say some limits are so low they cannot be practically measured and could disrupt the grain harvest.

The revised workplace exposure limits, which SWA says are based on current scientific evidence and independent expert advice, were agreed by work health and safety ministers and published in April 2024. They are scheduled to take effect on December 1, 2026, following a public consultation process conducted between 2019 and 2021.

West Australian Grain Group chair Alastair Falconer said farmers were alarmed by an 80 per cent reduction in the accepted exposure limit for phosphine, a fumigant relied upon by the grain industry to keep insects out of stored and exported grain. “It's concerning, and I'm not sure if there's equipment that can measure such [new] low levels,” he said, adding that the new rule “almost renders phosphine unusable”.

Mr Falconer noted that many importing countries reject entire shipments if insects are found due to biosecurity laws, making phosphine critical to Australia's $33 billion grain export industry. He also said exposure limits for grain dust — including oats, wheat and barley — had been more than halved, and the industry was scrambling to understand how to measure exposure and comply.

“When we're blowing down harvesters, we're cleaning out our own silos, what exposure is that giving us, how do you measure exposure when you're blowing down a harvester, and what's the correct PPE to use to make sure you don't go over this new limit,” Mr Falconer said. He called for a three-year delay in implementation to allow industry to research whether the levels are appropriate and how to manage them.

In a statement, Safe Work Australia said it recognised questions about how limits for phosphine and other airborne contaminants are applied in practice and is working with industry stakeholders and other government agencies — including the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority and the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry — to support a consistent understanding of the requirements. SWA said the revised limits reflect current scientific evidence and independent expert advice. Farming groups are calling on the government to intervene.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The new limits affect hundreds of substances used across agriculture and mining, industries central to Western Australia's economy.
  • If industry cannot practically measure or comply, there is risk of disrupted grain harvests and export logistics, with potential billions in losses.
  • The clash between worker safety goals and on-the-ground practicality highlights the challenge of translating science into regulation.

Background

Safe Work Australia is the national policy body responsible for developing model work health and safety laws. Its workplace exposure limits (WELs) set maximum airborne concentrations of hazardous substances considered safe over a working lifetime. The current revision, years in the making, updates limits for hundreds of dusts, fumes and chemicals — including agricultural staples like grain dust and phosphine. Phosphine is widely used to fumigate stored grain and is essential for meeting biosecurity requirements of export markets.

Key Perspectives

Safe Work Australia: The revised limits are grounded in current scientific evidence and independent expert advice, following extensive public consultation (2019-2021) and ministerial approval. The agency says it is working with industry and other government bodies to clarify application. Farmers and miners (via West Australian Grain Group): The new limits, especially the 80% cut for phosphine and more-than-halved grain dust limits, are impractical. They question whether monitoring equipment can detect such low levels and call for a three-year delay to research compliance solutions. Critics/Skeptics: Some industry representatives note they were unaware of existing limits, suggesting a gap in communication and preparedness. The rushed timeline may leave businesses unable to comply or forced to abandon essential practices like fumigation.

What to Watch

  • Whether the federal government responds to calls for intervention or a delay in the December 1, 2026 implementation date.
  • Guidance from Safe Work Australia on measurement methods for phosphine and grain dust — will it satisfy industry concerns?
  • Potential economic impacts on grain exports if the rules cause fumigation to be curtailed or halted.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.