AI data centre builder Firmus Technologies has told a Tasmanian parliamentary inquiry it intends to use diesel generators only during emergencies, despite appealing a council condition limiting their use to emergencies, maintenance and testing.
Firmus operational AI data centres in Melbourne and Singapore and is planning more in Tasmania, South Australia, Indonesia and Malaysia. The company is building an AI data centre in the Launceston suburb of St Leonards, has approval for another at Long Reach in northern Tasmania, and is seeking approval for a third at Wesley Vale in the north-west.
When Firmus gained planning approval for its Long Reach facility, George Town Council imposed a condition that the 276 backup diesel generators could only be used during emergencies, maintenance and testing, following community concerns about environmental and noise impacts. Firmus appealed the condition, calling it "unreasonable" and stating it would prevent it from using generators during periods of "energy market stress". Tasmania's Environment Protection Authority has since sought to join the appeal, stating in its submission that it would have assessed the proposal differently had it known the generators would be used "potentially whenever it is commercially convenient for the operator".
Appearing before the inquiry on Tuesday, Firmus energy manager Paul Grzinic told MPs the company's intent was for the generators to be "backup generation" used only in an emergency. "They are not intended — as others have claimed — for us to run these when commercially convenient, or any other means other than in an emergency situation," Grzinic said.
Greens MP and acting inquiry chair Tabatha Badger pressed the issue, noting the contradiction between the company's stated position and its appeal of the council condition. "You say it's only for emergency use — that's what the condition was imposed by the council — and yet you're appealing that," she said. "So you can understand for Tasmanians listening, that's not going to add up and make a whole lot of sense."
Grzinic said he could not speak in detail about the appeal while it was ongoing. "We're just seeking, effectively, clarification of — it's quite broad, that definition of emergency — so we're just seeking clarification," he said.
Firmus is setting up a research and development facility at its Wesley Vale site to investigate ways to reduce reliance on backup diesel generators.
Co-chief executive and co-founder Tim Rosenfield declined to reveal the company's customers when asked by Ms Badger. “Like any commercial data centre developer, if you look at some of our listed peers in Australia, it's not normal practice to disclose who your customers are at any particular location,” he said, adding that disclosure could be for security or contractual confidentiality reasons. The company has previously said it has contracted the Launceston and Wesley Vale facilities to customers, while Long Reach was under option to a customer.
Last month, Firmus withdrew its highly-anticipated initial public offering after lacklustre investor interest. Mr Rosenfield told the inquiry the cancelled float did not change the company's plans. "We have extremely supportive shareholders who are backing us to grow exactly the same way we've always planned to grow," he said. "An IPO is just a means to a transaction, we decided not to pursue that particular transaction but that doesn't change our growth plans — not one bit."
The inquiry will continue hearings with stakeholders about AI data centres in Tasmania before making recommendations to the government.
Analysis
Why This Matters
- The dispute over diesel generator use highlights tensions between the rapid growth of AI data centres and local environmental concerns
- The outcome of Firmus's appeal could set a precedent for how backup generators at large data centres are regulated in Tasmania and beyond
- The company's refusal to disclose customers raises questions about transparency for major energy users in the state
Background
Firmus Technologies is an AI data centre builder with operational sites in Melbourne and Singapore. Its Tasmanian expansion plans include three facilities in the north of the state. Last month the company abandoned its initial public offering, which would have been the largest Australian float since Telstra in 1997. The Tasmanian parliamentary inquiry is examining the implications of AI data centres in the state, including their environmental and energy impacts.
Key Perspectives
Firmus Technologies: Through energy manager Paul Grzinic, the company said diesel generators are intended only for emergencies, maintenance and testing, not for commercial convenience. Co-chief executive Tim Rosenfield said the company's growth plans remain unchanged despite the cancelled IPO.
Greens MP Tabatha Badger: Questioned why the company was appealing the council condition if it only intended to use generators in emergencies, calling the position inconsistent.
Tasmania's Environment Protection Authority: Argues in its submission that it would have assessed the Long Reach proposal differently had it known generators would be used "potentially whenever it is commercially convenient for the operator".
Student protesters: Called for AI companies to be transparent about water use, energy use and diesel generators, and for federal government regulation of AI's environmental impacts and effects on education.
What to Watch
- The result of Firmus's appeal of the George Town Council condition on generator use
- Further hearings of the Tasmanian parliamentary inquiry and its recommendations to government
- Whether the company eventually reveals its customers for Tasmanian data centres
Checked
12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 11 supported.
Show each claim
- SupportedFirmus told the Tasmanian inquiry it would use diesel generators only for emergencies.Latest Science news: “AI data centre builder Firmus Technologies has told a parliamentary inquiry it would only use diesel generators at its sites during emergencies.”
- Partly supportedThe council condition limits generator use to emergencies, as the summary says.Latest Science news: “George Town Council imposed a condition that the 276 backup diesel generators could only be used during emergencies, maintenance and testing.”
- SupportedFirmus says its intent is emergency-only use despite appealing the council condition.Latest Science news: “Firmus appealed the condition, calling it "unreasonable" and stating it would prevent it from using generators during periods of "energy market stress".”
- SupportedThe Long Reach facility has 276 backup diesel generators, and the council condition allows their use for emergencies, maintenance and testing.Latest Science news: “George Town Council imposed a condition that the 276 backup diesel generators could only be used during emergencies, maintenance and testing.”
- SupportedFirmus called the condition “unreasonable” and said it would prevent generator use during “energy market stress”.Latest Science news: “Firmus appealed the condition, calling it "unreasonable" and stating it would prevent it from using generators during periods of "energy market stress".”
- SupportedTasmania’s EPA sought to join the appeal, saying it would have assessed the proposal differently had it known generators could be used when commercially convenient.Latest Science news: “Tasmania's Environment Protection Authority has since sought to join the appeal , stating in its submission that it would have assessed the proposal differently had it known the generators would be used "potentially whenever it is commercially convenient for the operator".”
- SupportedGrzinic said the generators were not intended to run when commercially convenient or other than in an emergency.Latest Science news: “They are not intended — as others have claimed — for us to run these when commercially convenient, or any other means other than in an emergency situation.”
- SupportedBadger challenged Firmus over appealing a condition that already limited generator use to emergencies, and said the position would not make sense to Tasmanians.Latest Science news: “"You say it's only for emergency use — that's what the condition was imposed by the council — and yet you're appealing that," she said. "So you can understand for Tasmanians listening, that's not going to add up and make a whole lot of sense."”
- SupportedGrzinic said Firmus was seeking clarification because the definition of emergency was broad.Latest Science news: “"We're just seeking, effectively, clarification of — it's quite broad, that definition of emergency — so we're just seeking clarification," he said.”
- SupportedRosenfield said it was not normal practice for commercial data centre developers to disclose customers at a particular location.Latest Science news: “"Like any commercial data centre developer, if you look at some of our listed peers in Australia, it's not normal practice to disclose who your customers are at any particular location," he said.”
- SupportedFirmus had said it contracted the Launceston and Wesley Vale facilities to customers, while Long Reach was under option to a customer.Latest Science news: “The company has previously said it has contracted the Launceston and Wesley Vale facilities to customers, while Long Reach was under option to a customer.”
- SupportedLast month Firmus withdrew its IPO after lacklustre investor interest.Latest Science news: “Last month, Firmus was forced to withdraw its highly-anticipated initial public offering (IPO) — set to be the biggest float in the Australian share market since Telstra in 1997 — after lacklustre interest from investors.”