Former UN food agency official alleges dismissal for highlighting Gaza hunger, launches appeal

Benjamin Davis says FAO refused to renew contract after his team published a brief on hunger and held a seminar; director general threatened to fire more staff who engage in 'political games'

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time4 min
Benjamin Davis, a former senior official at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), has accused the agency of firing him for his work drawing attention to hunger in Gaza, and said he has begun an appeal against the decision. The 62-year-old Spanish-American dual citizen left the FAO last week after 26 years of service, alleging that his contract was not renewed because his team had published a brief on hunger in Gaza and held a seminar on the subject last year, and because he participated in weekly moments of silence for those killed in Gaza.

A former senior UN food agency official has alleged he was fired last week for his work highlighting hunger in Gaza, and has launched an appeal against his dismissal.

Benjamin Davis said the leadership of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) had refused to renew his contract as director of its rural transformation and gender equality division because his team had published a brief on hunger in Gaza and held a seminar on the subject last year, and because he had taken part in weekly "moment of silence" vigils on FAO grounds for those killed.

The seminar on hunger in Gaza last September triggered a complaint from the Israeli mission to the FAO, which also sent a diplomat to take pictures of staff taking part in a moment of silence gathering last October, according to a FAO staff report filed at the time.

Davis left the FAO last week after 26 years of service. Video of the event shows FAO staff standing and applauding him as he left the Rome headquarters for the last time.

"It's a nice feeling that I'm not alone, that other people are behind me in this," Davis said. "I was stopped constantly in the hallways by people, even those that I didn't know, just to shake my hand or just to thank me or just to say that they supported me or that they were upset."

The FAO did not respond to the Guardian's request for comment on Monday, but the organisation's director general, Qu Dongyu, appeared to refer to Davis's dismissal in public remarks last Tuesday, in which he threatened to fire more people for what he deemed to be political activism.

"We are not going to allow you to play the game here of human rights," said Qu, a veteran Chinese agronomist. "Of course human rights are very important, but they have a human rights agency in Geneva. If you want to take care [of human rights], go there."

"Thats why [when] some senior members play political games here, I fire him," he said, suggesting that Davis had violated staff regulations. "I'm a very soft person. I didn't fire that many. I'm going to use my last year ... to fire more if they're against the law."

Davis said he and fellow FAO staff members had been stunned by Qu's remarks.

"Even more than the threat about firing people was just what he said about human rights. I think that really shocked people because it undermined the foundations of why we're here basically, or why FAO is part of the United Nations and why the United Nations exists," he said.

"We're surely an organisation which is based on human rights, right?" Davis added, pointing to the FAO slogan: "Leave no one behind."

The official letter informing Davis that his contract would not be renewed said that Qu was "no longer confident in your ability to discharge your obligations in the manner required of a senior international civil servant".

The letter cited paragraphs in the official code of conduct for international civil servants regarding "honesty, truthfulness, impartiality and incorruptibility" and limits on public expression of personal views on "controversial matters".

In his written response, Davis said the approach taken by FAO leadership was "simply wrong".

"Silence in the face of suffering and injustice is not neutrality, it is complicity," he wrote. "Shutting down discussion on the starvation of the Palestinian people weakens the reputation of the organisation and the legitimacy of our mandate. Being true to our mandate calls for a frank and open discussion."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case raises questions about political interference in UN agencies and the limits on staff advocacy on humanitarian issues.
  • It highlights the ongoing dispute over reporting on hunger in Gaza and whether international civil servants can speak out on conflicts without reprisal.
  • The outcome of Davis's appeal could set a precedent for how UN agencies handle internal dissent on politically sensitive topics.

Background

The Food and Agriculture Organization is a UN agency focused on eliminating hunger and improving nutrition. Under Director General Qu Dongyu, a Chinese agronomist appointed in 2019 and now in his final year, the FAO has faced criticism from some staff for prioritising political neutrality over public comment on crises. Davis had worked at FAO for 26 years, leading work on rural transformation and gender equality.

Key Perspectives

Benjamin Davis (fired FAO official): He argues that his work on Gaza hunger was consistent with the FAO's mandate and that the organisation's leadership silenced legitimate discussion of starvation. He has appealed the non-renewal of his contract. FAO leadership (Director General Qu Dongyu): Qu has framed the dismissal as enforcing staff regulations against political activism. His public remarks suggest he sees human rights advocacy as outside the FAO's remit. FAO staff and supporters: Many staff applauded Davis on his departure, indicating internal solidarity. Some may fear further crackdowns as Qu has threatened to fire more people.

What to Watch

  • Davis's appeal process within the UN internal justice system.
  • Any further dismissals or disciplinary actions by Qu in his final year.
  • Reactions from other UN agencies and human rights bodies, particularly the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.