Foster care reunification model under scrutiny after infant death prompts calls for more support

Experts and carers say children are being re-traumatised by forced visitations under a system they describe as broken

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Foster care experts are calling for greater support for families reuniting with children, following the death of an eight-month-old less than three days after being returned to biological parents in Victoria. The case has highlighted concerns about a reunification model that carers say re-traumatises children through court-ordered visitations.

Victorian foster carer Sasha, whose name has been changed for legal reasons, said a six-year-old girl under her care since she was a baby had been repeatedly distressed by scheduled visits with her biological mother, who was unwell and abusive. Emma would wait for her mother, who often failed to attend, and would then be 'distraught' and take weeks to settle after the visits, Sasha said.

Heather Baird, founder of A Better Life For Foster Kids, said she had seen many children resist visitation and become distressed. She said that from around six to eight years of age, children often began verbally refusing to attend.

Victoria's previous legislation gave biological parents a two-year window to regain custody after a child entered out-of-home care. In May 2026, the Children, Youth and Families (Stability) Act 2026 came into effect, removing that time limit on reunification orders. Baird said that in some cases the biological parent had abused the child or was unwell due to substance abuse or mental health.

The Department of Family, Fairness and Housing says the aim of a family reunification order is to safely return a child to the care of their parents.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The death of an infant just days after reunification raises urgent questions about the safety checks and support provided during the reunification process.
  • The new legislation removes a two-year time limit, potentially keeping children in limbo longer or allowing more time for parents to address issues.
  • Foster carers and advocates are calling for better mental health and substance abuse support for biological parents, and for children's voices to be heard in visitation decisions.

Background

The foster care reunification model aims to return children to their biological parents when it is safe to do so. However, critics argue the system prioritises reunification over the child's wellbeing. The recent law change in Victoria removed a statutory time limit, giving courts more discretion but also raising concerns about protracted uncertainty for children.

Key Perspectives

Foster carers: They report that court-ordered visitations can re-traumatise children, especially when parents fail to attend or when contact is with a parent who is abusive or unwell. Carers say they are left to manage the emotional fallout without adequate support. Advocates: Organisations like A Better Life For Foster Kids argue that children's refusal to attend visits should be taken seriously, and that the system must better prioritise the child's stability and mental health. Government and child protection authorities: The Department of Family, Fairness and Housing states that the goal of reunification orders is safe return to parents. The new legislation provides greater flexibility, which the government argues can better respond to individual cases.

What to Watch

  • Implementation and early outcomes of the Children, Youth and Families (Stability) Act 2026 in Victoria.
  • Any coronial or departmental inquiries into the death of the eight-month-old.
  • Whether foster carer reports of children resisting visitation lead to legislative or policy changes around child consent.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.