Sunday 18 October 2026
Live
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Australia

Four Corners Investigation Finds Widespread Pregnancy Discrimination in Australian Workplaces

Melbourne woman takes real estate agency to Federal Court after alleged dismissal over pregnancy

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
An ABC Four Corners investigation has revealed that more than 100 women across Australia have lost their jobs after becoming pregnant or having a child. Nearly a quarter of the women who contacted the program worked in the public sector. The investigation identified what it describes as an unwritten playbook of tactics used by employers to push mothers out of the workforce.

Melbourne rental property manager Abby McCawley was five months pregnant when she was dismissed from her role at Ray White Brunswick. After taking two days off for morning sickness, she returned to find her computer access had been revoked. Her boss immediately terminated her employment. “I burst into tears,” Ms McCawley told Four Corners. “It had to be because I was pregnant.”

Just a week earlier, the agency had posted a glowing endorsement of her on Instagram. Ms McCawley says she was initially told the dismissal was due to an “office restructure”, then was later told it was for “performance reasons”. Her lawyer, Laura Blandthorn from Solidarity Solicitors, has alleged “very clear, direct discrimination” and noted “a shift in the alleged reason for the dismissal”.

Mediation at the Fair Work Commission failed. Ms McCawley is now suing Ray White Brunswick in the Federal Court. The Four Corners investigation collected accounts from more than 100 women who said they lost work after becoming pregnant or having a child. Of the 104 women who volunteered their stories, 48 said they were made redundant. Some worked at Australia’s largest companies. The program says the cases point to a systemic problem, not isolated instances of bad management.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Highlights systemic workplace practices that appear to circumvent legal protections against pregnancy discrimination.
  • Undermines workforce participation and financial security for new mothers at a critical life stage.
  • Shows the limitations of Fair Work Commission mediation, forcing complainants to pursue costly Federal Court action.

Background

Pregnancy discrimination has been illegal in Australia for decades. The Four Corners investigation suggests these laws are failing to prevent widespread dismissal of pregnant women and new mothers. The program identified what it calls an unwritten “playbook” of employer tactics, such as sudden restructures or belated performance claims, used to mask discriminatory terminations.

Key Perspectives

Affected women and their advocates: Argue dismissals are direct discrimination, often disguised by shifting employer justifications that are difficult to challenge without legal representation. Employers (inferred position): May cite operational restructures or performance issues as legitimate grounds for termination, creating a significant burden of proof for employees seeking legal remedy. Critics: The shifting reasons given for dismissal in cases like Ms McCawley’s illustrate the difficulty regulators face in enforcing anti-discrimination laws and the gaps in the current dispute resolution framework.

What to Watch

  • The outcome of Ms McCawley’s Federal Court case against Ray White Brunswick.
  • Whether the government or Fair Work Ombudsman reviews the “playbook” tactics or initiates a broader inquiry.
  • Potential legislative debate around shifting the burden of proof in pregnancy and discrimination dismissal cases.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe