Replit CEO says company has dropped Anthropic; insiders dispute claim

Masad cites cost, performance and partnership reasons, saying OpenAI models now win on internal benchmarks

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
Replit is no longer working with Anthropic, the company's CEO and co-founder Amjad Masad said on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt on Thursday, citing cost, partnership and performance reasons. The claim was immediately disputed by a person familiar with the partnership, who said it was still in place.

Replit, the cloud-based software development platform popular with startup founders and developers, has ended its partnership with AI lab Anthropic, according to CEO and co-founder Amjad Masad. Speaking on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt on Thursday, Masad said the decision came down to several factors, including cost.

Replit announced a partnership with OpenAI in August, but had given no previous indication that it had parted ways with Anthropic. Under the earlier partnership, Replit used Anthropic's Claude models to run its platform, an arrangement reported to have helped the company grow revenue significantly.

"I think ChatGPT is better now," Masad said, adding that the company uses an internal benchmark to assess performance. "We publish a public benchmark as well, and consistently, Sol and Astra perform better on building vibe-coded applications from scratch. It was a decision based on both cost, partnership, and performance. And for all these reasons, we just felt like they were a better partner for now."

However, Masad's comments were rejected by a person familiar with the Anthropic-Replit partnership, who asked not to be named and said the partnership was still in place.

Public evidence suggests Replit was using Anthropic products as recently as a few weeks ago. A late September blog post cites Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 as models running in Replit Agent's production environment, and around the same time a Replit product employee posted on X about using Anthropic's flagship model Opus 5.5. TechCrunch has reached out to Replit for clarification.

Masad also shared details of the company's growth at the conference, saying enterprise contracts made up about 2% of revenue last year but around 15% this year, with more than 50% of revenue now coming from B2B customers.

Discussing AI safety, Masad said agents need a secure environment to work in: "In the same way that us humans need a certain environment to work ... agents need a habitat for them to exist and do good work. So that habitat has good orchestration, good error recovery, good safety and security and sandboxing, good networking, good identity and authorization."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The dispute over whether the partnership has ended matters because Replit is a widely used AI coding platform, and its model choices shape which AI models thousands of developers use daily.
  • The switch from Claude to OpenAI models would be a notable competitive win for OpenAI against Anthropic, one of the most closely watched rivalries in AI.
  • The conflicting statements leave uncertainty over Replit's model supply, which could affect users who rely on the platform for app development.

Background

Replit operates a browser-based development platform where users can build and deploy software without leaving their browser. It has become popular among founders and developers building AI-assisted applications. The company announced a partnership with OpenAI in August, but had not previously said anything about the status of its earlier partnership with Anthropic, which reportedly helped Replit grow revenue significantly.

Key Perspectives

Replit: Amjad Masad frames the move as a deliberate and rational choice based on cost, partnership quality and performance, with OpenAI models winning on public and internal benchmarks for building applications from scratch. Anthropic and its supporters: A person familiar with the partnership insists it is still in place, and public blog posts and social media activity from Replit show Anthropic models in use as recently as late September, casting doubt on Masad's account. Critics and skeptics: The contradiction between Masad's on-stage statement and the insider's denial raises questions about whether the announcement was premature, overstated, or part of a broader shift in partnerships that has not been fully disclosed.

What to Watch

  • Whether Replit issues a formal clarification or update after TechCrunch's request for comment.
  • Whether Anthropic publicly confirms or denies that the partnership has ended.
  • Whether Replit's public benchmark results and documentation continue to list Anthropic models in production.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe