Government knew of ATO credit card ban in July, assistant treasurer admits

Daniel Mulino says indication was given for a transition period, but quick intervention followed backlash

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources6 outlets
Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino has conceded the government was aware from July that the Australian Taxation Office was considering banning credit card payments, months before the decision sparked a backlash that forced a government intervention. Mr Mulino told ABC's Insiders on Sunday that he and Treasurer Jim Chalmers knew of the ATO's preference to stop accepting credit cards in July and instructed the agency to engage with credit card companies and allow a transition period.

The ATO announced in late September that it would stop accepting credit card payments from December 1, a decision that drew sharp criticism from small businesses. The backlash prompted the prime minister and treasurer to intervene, underwriting the costs so credit cards could continue to be accepted by the tax office until mid-2027.

Mr Mulino said the government stepped in "very quickly" once stakeholder feedback came in. "The transition period, as it turned out, from stakeholder feedback, wasn't enough. And so that's where the government stepped in," he said.

He acknowledged that accepting credit card payments indefinitely would have "very serious fiscal ramifications for the budget" and that the government always argued for a transition period rather than a permanent ban.

The ATO initially defended its decision, saying it could not absorb the estimated $200 million cost and that continuing to accept credit cards would reduce revenue available for government services. Taxation Commissioner Rob Heferen said the ATO "would have preferred to continue accepting credit cards" but that credit card companies did not offer a low enough rate.

The move followed a Reserve Bank of Australia decision to scrap card surcharges from October 1, which the bank said was "in the public interest" and was costing consumers about $1.6 billion a year.

Earlier this month, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said he was aware the ATO was "grappling" with the decision before it was finalised in late September, but was not aware of the specific timeline.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Small businesses that rely on credit card payments faced disruption from the December 1 cut-off, with only two months' notice.
  • The government's acknowledgment of prior knowledge raises questions about the adequacy of preparation and consultation.
  • The eventual intervention to underwrite costs until mid-2027 provides temporary relief but leaves the longer-term payment method uncertain.

Background

The ATO stopped accepting credit card payments after the Reserve Bank of Australia removed surcharge rules, which the bank said saved consumers about $1.6 billion a year. The ATO said it could not absorb the $200 million cost of processing credit card fees and that continuing to do so would mean less funding for government services. The government's eventual intervention came after businesses complained they had insufficient time to adjust.

Key Perspectives

Government (Assistant Treasurer Mulino): The government was aware of the ATO's preference in July and encouraged a transition period. Stepping in quickly after the backlash shows it was listening. Indefinite acceptance of credit cards would have been too costly for the budget. Small businesses: Left with a two-month notice period, they argued the transition was too short and that credit cards are essential for cash flow and paying tax obligations. ATO (Commissioner Heferen): The agency preferred to keep accepting credit cards but could not secure a low enough rate from credit card companies and could not justify absorbing the $200 million cost.

What to Watch

  • Whether the government extends the mid-2027 underwriting deadline or negotiates lower credit card fees.
  • The impact on small businesses' payment behaviour and whether alternative payment methods gain traction.
  • Further scrutiny of how government agencies consult with affected stakeholders before major policy changes.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe