Green party drops longstanding opposition to nuclear power

Members vote to assess reactors on a case-by-case basis, ending blanket ban

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
The Green Party of England and Wales has voted to end its blanket opposition to nuclear fission, adopting a policy that allows elected representatives to support new nuclear projects on a case-by-case basis. The shift, which prioritises offshore wind, onshore wind and rooftop solar as primary electricity sources, was described by the party as an evolution recognising nuclear's role during the transition to a renewables-based system.

Green party members voted at their conference to drop the party's longstanding commitment to phase out nuclear power, replacing a "blanket opposition to nuclear fission" with a policy that assesses nuclear alongside other low-carbon technologies.

The motion, which removes the previous opposition, prioritises offshore wind, onshore wind and rooftop solar as the main sources of electricity but allows elected representatives to support new nuclear reactors individually.

Green MP Carla Denyer said the decision reflects the reality that nuclear has a part to play while the country shifts towards a primarily renewable system. "This evolution of our policy does not commit the party to backing new nuclear, but accepts this power source is here to stay for now, while we transition to electricity generation based primarily on renewable sources," she said.

Denyer, who in 2023 described nuclear energy as "incredibly slow and incredibly expensive" and said renewables were the way forward, now argues that keeping existing plants running could be low-carbon because much of their emissions come from construction. Her position as energy secretary, she said, would be to keep existing plants in operation while considering new proposals carefully.

Other senior Greens had previously criticised nuclear power. Party leader Zack Polanski has called it outdated and compared investment in new reactors to "creating a fax machine." Last year, then co-leader Adrian Ramsay criticised government support for Sizewell C, calling it a "nuclear gamble" and urging that money be spent on home insulation instead.

The party's original opposition to nuclear fission was rooted in its founding stance against nuclear weapons.

Eugene McCarthy, a co-founder of the group Greens for Nuclear and a supporter of the motion, said the climate crisis demands an open mind. "We are at the throw-the-kitchen-sink-at-it phase of the climate crisis where you cannot be ruling anything out for things like Chernobyl happening in the 1980s," he said. The motion, he explained, lets MPs assess each proposal on its merits rather than taking a blanket position for or against the technology.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Green party's shift could reshape UK energy policy debates by removing a major political barrier to new nuclear stations, potentially affecting decisions on projects like Sizewell C.
  • It reflects a broader global trend among environmental movements grappling with the tension between anti-nuclear positions and the urgency of decarbonisation.
  • The decision may influence other Green parties internationally and signals a pragmatic turn in climate politics.

Background

The Green Party of England and Wales has opposed nuclear fission since its founding, primarily due to the party's anti-nuclear weapons stance. Leaders including Zack Polanski and Adrian Ramsay have previously denigrated nuclear technology as outdated and too expensive. The motion represents a significant departure from that history, driven by the recognition that existing nuclear plants provide low-carbon power and that new projects may be needed during the renewable transition.

Key Perspectives

[Carla Denyer, Green MP]: Supports the evolution as evidence-based, favouring life extension of existing plants while scrutinising new proposals for cost, speed and environmental impact. [Eugene McCarthy, Greens for Nuclear]: Argues the climate crisis is too urgent to rule out any technology and that the motion gives MPs flexibility to make sensible decisions on individual projects. [Critics within the party]: Previous comments from Denyer, Polanski and Ramsay highlight deep scepticism about nuclear's cost, timelines and opportunity cost compared to renewables and efficiency measures.

What to Watch

  • Whether Green MPs begin to support specific nuclear projects, such as Sizewell C, and how the party reconciles internal divisions.
  • The reaction from other environmental groups and the broader Labour and Conservative energy policy landscape.
  • Any further motions or policy reviews that might deepen or reverse this shift ahead of the next general election.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.