AustraliaDeveloping

Greens senator Steele-John takes party room leave after letter alleges inappropriate comments to women

Seven party members, including current and former staffers, demand an investigation into claims spanning 2017 to 2025

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources4 outlets
Senator Jordon Steele-John has taken leave from the Greens party room after seven party members wrote to party leader David Shoebridge demanding an investigation into allegations of inappropriate comments to women. The letter, sent on Tuesday night, says its authors are aware of multiple allegations against the Western Australian senator spanning almost a decade.

In the letter, the signatories say they are aware of "multiple allegations" against Steele-John between 2017 and 2025, all concerning "his behaviour in the presence of women." They say women who have taken up roles or volunteered in the party have been warned not to be alone with him, and that these warnings have come "from inside and outside the party."

The signatories include five current and former staffers and two active branch members. The newspapers reporting the story know the authors' identities but have chosen not to name them to protect their privacy and, in some cases, their current employment.

Shoebridge announced Steele-John was taking leave from the Greens party room in response to inquiries from reporters. It was not clear whether the leave also extended to parliament.

Steele-John said he "utterly reject[s] this characterisation of me, which tries to assert I am someone I am not." He said he had referred the matter to the WA Greens "so that a fair, independent process can be commissioned that upholds the principles of natural justice and ensures procedural fairness for everyone involved."

"These claims are made without specifics, any allegation of this nature is extremely serious and must be treated accordingly," he said. "In the one complaint of which I have been made aware, I am the person who experienced family violence."

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The allegations against a serving federal senator raise questions about workplace culture and the handling of complaints within the Greens, a party that has campaigned strongly on gender equality and respect for women.
  • Whether Steele-John's leave extends beyond the party room to the Senate itself will determine his ability to represent Western Australian voters in parliament.
  • The dispute will test how the party's internal processes balance accountability with the senator's stated demand for procedural fairness and natural justice.

Background

Australian political parties have come under repeated scrutiny over how they handle allegations of misconduct by their own members. The Greens have historically positioned themselves as a party that holds other parties to account on gender issues, which sharpens the focus on how this matter is resolved internally. The letter is now with the party leadership and, at Steele-John's request, has been referred to the WA Greens to commission a process.

Key Perspectives

The letter's authors: Seven members, including five current and former staffers and two active branch members, say they are aware of multiple allegations between 2017 and 2025. They say women have been warned not to be alone with Steele-John and that knowledge of his alleged reputation extends beyond the party into the community. The senator: Steele-John says the characterisation is false, that the claims are made without specifics, and that he has referred the matter to the WA Greens for an independent process. He also notes that in the one complaint he is aware of, he was the person who experienced family violence. Greens leadership: David Shoebridge has announced that Steele-John is taking leave from the party room, but has not clarified whether this includes leave from parliament or detailed the terms of any investigation.

What to Watch

  • Whether Shoebridge or the WA Greens clarify the scope of the leave and the terms of reference for any independent process.
  • Whether the letter's authors provide the specific allegations they say exist, which would shift the matter from a general characterisation to individual complaints.
  • How Steele-John responds to any formal process, given his insistence on specifics and reliance on the principle of natural justice.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe