Grieving families decry aged care funding delays as $4,500 chair arrives after death

Two Queensland couples describe months-long waits for home care support as Senate inquiry hears of system failures

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
A Townsville widow received a taxpayer-funded lift chair just two weeks after her husband's death, part of a broader pattern of delayed federal home aged-care funding that has left families mourning loved ones who never received promised support.

Deidre de Jonge was preparing for her husband Gerrit's funeral when the $4,500 chair — funded by taxpayers and meant to help the terminally ill former miner stand and recline without muscle pain — finally arrived at their home in Townsville. It arrived two weeks after Mr de Jonge died, having been approved under the federal government's End of Life Pathway, which provides up to $2,000 for assistive technology and up to $25,000 for approved services over 12 weeks.

“I absolutely hated it, I hated the chair because it arrived too late,” Ms de Jonge said. “The only reason I've still got it is because my husband said we fought hard for it.”

The couple applied for My Aged Care funding in October 2024 after Mr de Jonge was diagnosed with terminal oesophageal cancer. About 15 months later, in January this year, he was told he had less than three months to live — still without receiving a cent in funding. His feet were so swollen he could barely walk, his widow recalled.

About 130 kilometres away, Daryll Mulgrue has been honouring her partner Geoff Small's memory with framed photos on a bookshelf. The 88-year-old died months before funding for his home care was due to arrive.

On June 30 this year, 107,000 people were waiting for the federal government's home aged-care program, Support at Home. That figure excludes another 53,000 people who received some funding while waiting, according to previous reporting in March. The federal aged care department has defended the program, saying wait times are falling, but did not respond to requests for comment.

Advocates say the experiences of the de Jonge and Mulgrue families reflect a system that is “broken”, and some appearing at a senate inquiry into the program this week are expected to describe similar failures and call for reform.

§

Analysis

Why this matters

  • Highlights systemic delays in Australia's home aged-care funding that can mean vulnerable people die before receiving approved support.
  • The personal stories of two families put a human face on a waitlist of more than 100,000 people, illustrating the real-world cost of administrative backlog.
  • Feeds into the current Senate inquiry into the Support at Home program, which could lead to policy changes or increased funding.

Background

The federal government's home aged-care program, Support at Home, provides funding for assistive technology and services to help older Australians live independently. The End of Life Pathway is a special category for people with terminal conditions, offering higher funding limits. However, long delays between approval and delivery have been a persistent problem, with the department previously attributing wait times to high demand and working to reduce them. A Senate inquiry is currently examining the program's effectiveness and equity.

Key perspectives

  • Families like the de Jonge and Mulgrue families: View the delays as a failure of the system, feeling abandoned during a terminal illness and left with unusable equipment or unmet needs.
  • Federal aged care department: Maintains the program is functioning, with wait times trending downward, and that funding is reaching those who need it, though it declined to comment on individual cases.
  • Aged care advocates: Argue the cases are not isolated and that the program is fundamentally broken, requiring structural reform to ensure timely delivery for those with limited time.

What to watch

  • Findings and recommendations from the Senate inquiry into the Support at Home program, expected to be released later this year.
  • Updated waitlist figures in coming months, particularly whether changes to how wait times are counted will show genuine improvement or just relabeling.
  • Any government announcement of additional funding or streamlined processes for end-of-life care approvals following public scrutiny.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.