Hezbollah demands return of seized explosives as Lebanon splits over their use

Group says TNT and C-4 were destined for its fight with Israel; rivals fear they could be used at home

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
Lebanon is divided over hundreds of kilos of explosives seized by security forces on October 5, after Hezbollah demanded the return of the cargo it says was meant for use against Israel and political opponents warned the bomb-making materials could be turned on domestic rivals.

On October 5, Lebanese security forces stopped a minivan at a checkpoint in Dahr el-Baydar, between the Bekaa Valley and the Mount Lebanon region, and found it carrying hundreds of kilos of explosive materials, including TNT and C-4, according to Lebanese officials.

On Thursday, Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah said the explosives belonged to the group, which had demanded their return along with the release of the two people detained in the vehicle. "From the moment the vehicle was detained, the relevant bodies within [Hezbollah] immediately contacted the security and judicial agencies and informed them that the vehicle and its cargo belonged to the resistance," he said in a statement.

Fadlallah said the explosives were for use against Israel, which continues to occupy large parts of southern Lebanon, not internally against the Lebanese government or other factions, as some political figures and analysts have suggested. "We therefore warn the [Lebanese] authorities of the consequences of continuing to escalate their measures," he said, adding that Hezbollah "will not tolerate any targeting by any party implementing American demands against our resistance."

Many of Hezbollah's political opponents, who blame the Iranian-backed group for carrying out assassinations in the past, fear the smuggled explosives will be turned against its detractors. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam pointed out that C-4 explosives had been used in previous assassinations, although investigators have not established that the seized shipment was intended for such an attack. Hezbollah has never admitted carrying out assassinations despite repeated accusations against it, including the killing of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005.

The standoff has deepened political divisions. On March 2, after Hezbollah responded to ongoing Israeli attacks for the first time in over a year, in retaliation for the killing of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Salam's government banned the group's military activities. His coalition includes two Hezbollah ministers who opposed the decision, and the group has repeatedly defied it by continuing to fight Israel.

Fighting has largely subsided since June, when Beirut and Tel Aviv signed a US-administered trilateral framework agreement under which pilot zones would be established in a phased process for Israel to eventually withdraw its troops and for the Lebanese Army to disarm Hezbollah. The programme has faced complications.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The seizure and Hezbollah's response test whether the Lebanese state can assert control over the country's most heavily armed faction.
  • An escalation by either side could shatter the relative calm that has held on the southern front since June.
  • The dispute raises the stakes for the US-backed framework agreement, under which the Lebanese Army is eventually meant to disarm Hezbollah as Israeli troops withdraw.

Background

Lebanon has long been split between Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed movement that is the country's dominant armed force, and political factions that accuse it of undermining the state. The group has never admitted carrying out assassinations, despite accusations including the 2005 killing of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. After more than a year without responding to Israeli attacks, Hezbollah renewed military action in March following the killing of Iran's Supreme Leader, prompting the government to ban its military activities. A US-administered framework agreement signed in June has largely quieted the fighting, but the disarmament programme has hit complications.

Key Perspectives

Hezbollah: The cargo belonged to the resistance and was intended to confront the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, not domestic factions. It demands the return of the explosives and the release of the two detainees, warning that it will not tolerate escalation by parties it says are implementing American demands.

The Lebanese government: Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has noted that C-4 has been used in past assassinations, and his government has banned Hezbollah's military activities, though two Hezbollah ministers in his coalition opposed that decision.

Hezbollah's political opponents: Citing the group's record, they fear the seized explosives could be used against domestic critics rather than against Israel, and want the authorities to hold the cargo and detainees.

What to Watch

  • Whether Hezbollah follows through on its warning to escalate measures against the Lebanese authorities.
  • How Lebanon's judiciary handles the two detainees and the confiscated cargo.
  • Progress on the US-administered framework agreement, and whether the standoff derails plans for the Lebanese Army to disarm Hezbollah.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe