HSC English exam asks students to consider 'the point isn't to catch a fish'

Metaphorical question on wonder and absorption rounds out 2026 English Advanced paper

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
Sources2 outlets
The final question on Wednesday's Higher School Certificate English Advanced exam used a fishing metaphor to prompt students to reflect on the importance of wonder, absorption and play for human flourishing, rather than merely achieving outcomes.

The question presented a premise: while "busyness and distraction" preoccupy most people, it is wonder, absorption and play that are essential for flourishing. It stated: "The point isn't to catch a fish – it's how you feel while you're trying to catch a fish."

Students were given a choice of writing creatively, persuasively or discursively in response. Bonnyrigg High student Tijana Kovacevic noted the question did not specifically ask about fishing, and said she opted for the discursive option.

The question formed the final part of Wednesday's English Advanced examination for 2026 HSC students in New South Wales.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The HSC English exam is a defining assessment for Year 12 students in NSW, with the final question often testing synthesis and original thinking.
  • The metaphorical framing reflects a broader educational emphasis on process and experience over measurable outcomes.
  • The question may influence how future cohorts prepare for open-ended, conceptual prompts.

Background

This question closed the 2026 HSC English Advanced paper, an exam taken by thousands of students across New South Wales. The Higher School Certificate is the culmination of secondary schooling in the state, and English is a mandatory component. The use of metaphorical stimuli is a recurring feature of the exam's final section.

Key Perspectives

Students: Some recognised the deeper philosophical layer beneath the fishing analogy, allowing them to connect it to studied texts. Others may have found the abstract framing challenging. Examiners: The design rewards students who can move beyond literal interpretation, testing their ability to engage with universal themes of purpose and experience. Critics/Skeptics: Some educators might argue that such abstract prompts disadvantage students less familiar with philosophical or metaphorical reasoning, though the source provides no direct criticism.

What to Watch

  • Student and teacher feedback on whether the question was fair and accessible.
  • Marking guidelines from NESA (NSW Education Standards Authority) that clarify acceptable interpretations.
  • Whether similar metaphorical prompts appear in future HSC English papers.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe