Robots often get stuck or make mistakes. People step in to correct them, but these corrections are not perfect. Existing algorithms assume humans always give optimal help, which is not true in practice.
Researchers analyzed how real people intervene when a robot fails. They found that people wait until the robot stops making progress, then step in with a correction that is often not the best move. Based on this, they created a new training method called Q-OIL. Q-OIL treats each human correction as a hint to explore good behaviors, not as a perfect example to copy. It adds a small bonus reward when a person intervenes, gently pushing the robot toward the correction.
In tests on simulated and real robot tasks, Q-OIL increased success rates by 10 to 50 percent while requiring about 30 percent fewer interventions from people. This makes human feedback more useful and reduces the effort needed from users.
