Interactive software judges improve when they test applications directly

Computer-use agents that operated generated applications predicted human preferences, verified requirements and guided repairs better than code-only evaluators.

Independent
Wayne Chi · I-Hung Hsu · Li Chen · Wei-Lin Chiang · Ion Stoica · Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos · +3 more
Research Digest··2 min read
Chi and colleagues tested whether an automated judge should use software as a person would, rather than assess only its source code or static screenshots.

The authors introduce Interaction-as-a-Judge, in which a computer-use agent operates an application and records a multimodal trace containing actions and visual responses.

Why this paper

Independent

In one line

Interaction-as-a-Judge using computer-use agents improves evaluation and generation of interactive applications over code-only methods.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks (2 benchmarks)

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe