Investors price in 32.6% AI productivity boost for software engineers, economists find

Stock market data suggests markets expect significant gains from AI coding tools, though researchers caution about over-optimism

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Economists from the University of California, Berkeley and the London School of Economics have used stock market movements to estimate that investors are pricing in a 32.6% permanent productivity increase for software engineers from AI, based on a new working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

The researchers—Alex Blumenfeld (UC Berkeley), Jonathon Hazell (LSE), Chen Lian (UC Berkeley), and Andreas Schaab (UC Berkeley)—analysed how company stock returns responded to AI-related news between November 2022 and December 2025. They found that firms with larger software engineering payroll shares experienced greater stock price increases when the AI stock index rose, which they attribute to investor expectations of productivity gains.

“We empirically measure whether firms with larger software engineering payroll shares experience larger stock-price increases when the AI stock index rises,” said Chen Lian, assistant professor of finance at UC Berkeley, in an email to The Register. “We then use an economic model to translate that relationship into the AI-driven software engineering productivity gains investors anticipate.”

The implied 32.6% productivity boost is comparable to the 21–56% acceleration on individual tasks reported by other studies. However, the authors note that task-level gains can be offset by bottlenecks such as code reviews unable to keep up with surging commit volumes.

Lian acknowledged that market expectations may not fully materialise. “Our estimates capture the market’s assessment of current and future productivity gains, and markets can be overly optimistic or pessimistic,” he said. “The advantage is a forward-looking measure, available in real time, when many of AI’s effects have yet to play out.”

Feeding the estimate into their economic model also produces a present-value GDP increase equivalent to a permanent 3.61% level rise. Lian said the method can be extended to study AI’s impact through other channels in future work.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The 32.6% figure represents what financial markets—often a leading indicator—believe AI will deliver in software engineering, influencing investment decisions, hiring, and training strategies.
  • If realised, such a productivity surge could reshape the software industry, potentially reducing demand for junior developers or shifting roles toward higher-level design and review tasks.
  • The implied 3.61% GDP boost underscores how AI’s effects might extend well beyond tech companies into the broader economy.

Background

Since OpenAI released ChatGPT in November 2022, generative AI coding assistants such as GitHub Copilot and Amazon CodeWhisperer have gained rapid adoption. The paper by Blumenfeld, Hazell, Lian, and Schaab is one of the first attempts to measure aggregate investor expectations of AI-driven productivity gains using stock market data, rather than surveys or lab experiments.

Key Perspectives

Investors and markets: The inference from stock price reactions suggests confidence that AI tools will meaningfully accelerate software development, with higher valuations for firms heavily reliant on engineering talent. Researchers and economists: The authors caution that markets can be overly optimistic or pessimistic, and the estimate is forward-looking rather than a proven outcome. Real-world bottlenecks, such as code review capacity, could limit actual gains. Critics and skeptics: Task-level productivity improvements (21–56%) might not translate to organisational productivity due to integration costs, quality concerns, and diminishing returns as AI tools are scaled.

What to Watch

  • Actual productivity data from software engineering teams using AI assistants, especially longitudinal studies measuring output per developer.
  • Adoption rates of AI coding tools across industries and whether bottlenecks like code review and testing emerge as constraints.
  • Subsequent research applying the same methodology to other sectors, which could indicate whether AI’s economic impact will be broad or concentrated.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.