Iranian men accused of plotting violence against journalists go on trial in London

Prosecutors say staff at the Persian-language channel Iran International were surveilled as potential targets for attack

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Three Iranian men have gone on trial at Woolwich Crown Court accused of spying for Iran on UK-based journalists, who prosecutors say were targeted so "serious violence" could be inflicted on them. The alleged targets worked for Iran International, the Persian-language satellite channel critical of the Tehran regime.

The prosecution, led by Bill Emlyn Jones KC, told the jury that Mostafa Sepahvand, 41, was to carry out the attack, while Farhad Manesh, 46, and Shapoor Noori, 57, carried out surveillance and reconnaissance. All three were born in Iran but were living in London.

The court heard that the men's targets were journalists working for Iran International, the Persian-language satellite channel that is critical of the Tehran regime and has its headquarters in London. At least two journalists linked to the channel were targeted, the prosecutor said, and at least one was to be "subjected to serious violence" as retribution and "to try to silence and deter others who might dare to voice their criticism".

Sepahvand does not deny his involvement but says he took part out of fear of the consequences of refusing. The prosecution described that as "an entirely bogus claim", arguing that he acted for money and to have a criminal conviction for theft in Iran "fixed". The court was told he was in contact with two men with Iranian telephone numbers.

Manesh and Noori are expected to say they did not know they were carrying out surveillance on behalf of Iran. All three deny the charges and face counts under the National Security Act, including "assisting a foreign intelligence service".

The prosecution said the evidence would show the defendants visited addresses linked to their targets, took photographs and video, and carried out online research about them. Iran International, which broadcasts into Iran, has been declared a "terrorist organisation" by Tehran.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The trial tests how far Iran's intelligence services can operate against diaspora media on UK soil.
  • It is one of the first major prosecutions under the UK's National Security Act, which modernised espionage law after years of concern about foreign interference.
  • A conviction would send a signal about protecting journalists abroad who report critically on Tehran.

Background

Iran International is a London-based Persian-language satellite news channel that broadcasts into Iran and is sharply critical of the Iranian government. Tehran has declared the channel a "terrorist organisation", a designation that frames its journalism as a security threat. Western authorities have for years accused Iran of plotting to kidnap or kill dissidents and journalists living abroad, and the UK introduced the National Security Act to strengthen the law against espionage and foreign interference. The case is being heard before a jury at Woolwich Crown Court.

Key Perspectives

The prosecution: alleges a planned attack in which Sepahvand would carry out violence while Manesh and Noori gathered intelligence. It rejects the claim that Sepahvand acted under fear, saying he did so for money and to have a theft conviction in Iran "fixed". Sepahvand: admits his involvement but says he feared the consequences of refusing, a defence the prosecution calls "an entirely bogus claim". Manesh and Noori: are expected to argue they did not know the surveillance was being carried out on behalf of Iran. Tehran: has designated Iran International a "terrorist organisation", framing the channel as a hostile actor rather than a news outlet.

What to Watch

  • The detail of the surveillance evidence, including photographs, video and online research the prosecution says the men gathered.
  • What the court hears about the two men with Iranian telephone numbers whom Sepahvand allegedly contacted.
  • The verdict and any sentence, which would be a marker for how seriously UK courts treat foreign-directed targeting of journalists.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.