Chatbots are tuned against a learned scorer, a reward model, built from human preferences; the tuned model is the policy. Policies learn to game the scorer with headers and padding that score well but read no better. Teams edit the scorer and wait for a costly run to learn if it worked.
Instead, score the policy's own outputs with the old and new scorers, then measure how a feature's use moves with the change in score across outputs answering the same prompt. This covariance needs no training.
It predicted every stable change's direction and explained 82% of the response size; the standard alternative explained far less. Ranking edits by their effect on fake versus real quality held only early in training.
