Larrakia custodians split as federal pressure mounts over Darwin Lee Point housing development

One senior custodian backs the Defence Housing Australia project; others say it will harm a sacred area

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Federal ministers are facing renewed pressure from cabinet colleagues to halt the controversial Lee Point housing development in Darwin, as divisions emerge within the local Larrakia Indigenous community over whether sacred site concerns should stop the project.

Defence Housing Australia is building 200 defence homes and 600 housing lots for private sale at Lee Point, in Darwin's northern suburbs. The development has drawn large public protests and dozens of arrests over the past four years, and has now become a source of friction inside federal cabinet and with Territory Labor.

Amid the pressure, Larrakia custodian Helen Secretary has publicly backed the project. She said the registered sacred site Binybara is a reef at the tip of Lee Point, not on the land being cleared.

"The story of Binybara is that that was Dariba Nungallya, Old Man Rock's wife," she said. "Where Defence is doing the clearing, there are no sacred sites within that area of land, so don't use sacred sites to stop development."

Ms Secretary, a 2024 Country Liberal Party candidate, said Defence Housing Australia had worked closely with Larrakia people under cultural heritage monitoring arrangements. "I'm for development, we need more housing. Darwin is a city now, we don't live in a time capsule and development is going to happen," she said.

Her position is directly opposed by Larrakia custodian Lorraine Juwayning Williams, who said the development would impact a sacred area.

Defence Housing Australia told the ABC it had "undertaken extensive consultation" with Larrakia people and would "continue to do so as the project progresses". Ms Secretary also criticised the NT Labor Opposition for changing its position to oppose the development after supporting it while in government.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The Lee Point dispute places a federal housing project at the centre of competing demands for urban development and Indigenous heritage protection.
  • The split among Larrakia custodians complicates the political case for stopping the project, and shows traditional owner views are not uniform.
  • The outcome could set a precedent for how future developments near registered sacred sites are assessed and consulted on.

Background

Lee Point is in Darwin's northern suburbs, where Defence Housing Australia is delivering a mix of defence homes and private housing lots. The development has been a flashpoint for years, with protesters arguing it threatens culturally significant country. Australian law and policy give special weight to registered sacred sites, but disputes can still arise over the extent of impacts and the adequacy of consultation.

Key Perspectives

Helen Secretary (Larrakia custodian, supports the development): She argues the sacred site Binybara is a reef off the coast, that no sacred sites sit within the clearing area, and that Darwin needs new housing. Lorraine Juwayning Williams (Larrakia custodian, opposes the development): She says the development will impact a sacred area. Federal ministers and Defence Housing Australia: They point to extensive consultation with Larrakia people and say that will continue as the project progresses. Protesters and NT Labor: Many Larrakia people and supporters have opposed the project through protests and arrests, and Territory Labor has shifted to oppose it after previously backing it in government.

What to Watch

  • Whether cabinet colleagues escalate pressure on the ministers responsible for Defence Housing Australia.
  • Any new cultural heritage monitoring findings on the land being cleared.
  • Whether NT Labor's changed position influences federal decision-making or further public protest.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe