Panel finds Glenorchy alderman breached code of conduct over treatment of female staff

Peter Ridler, who is seeking re-election, faces findings over a series of incidents in late 2024

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Glenorchy City Council Alderman Peter Ridler, who is seeking re-election, breached the council's code of conduct through a series of inappropriate interactions with female employees, a code of conduct panel has found. The determination, made public this week, followed a complaint from the council's former chief executive, Tony McMullen.

A local government code of conduct panel investigated a complaint lodged last year by the council's former chief executive, Tony McMullen, after it came to his attention that female workers were distressed following interactions with Alderman Ridler.

The panel, made up of Lynn Mason, Philip Cocker and David Palmer, found Alderman Ridler breached the code on several days in November and December 2024. Its findings include that he rubbed a female staff member's back while she adjusted a fan in a committee room, put his arm around a staff member's waist, stood "unnecessarily directly behind" an employee who felt "trapped against the desk", and seized the name badge of a female employee from where it was clipped to her clothing on her chest.

He was also found to have told a staff member to "stick to your knitting and get back to the kitchen" during a council workshop, used a racial slur at a council workshop, and said during the council's annual general meeting, while looking at a female staff member, that he would "get his whip out" to speed up the distribution of the annual report.

The panel said Alderman Ridler continued to behave inappropriately after telling the council's acting chief executive in December 2024 that he was "clear on the issues raised". It found his behaviour showed a "lack of awareness of proper conduct in modern Australian society, particularly in the workplace" and a "wilful disregard for the advice given him".

Some elements of the complaint, including allegations that he bullied staff and breached sections of the code relating to expressing personal views, were dismissed. The panel said phrases such as "get the whip out" and "get back to the kitchen" were not expressions of personal views but "his patterns of speech". It also noted another alderman had spoken to Alderman Ridler about his behaviour with staff.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Alderman Ridler is standing for re-election, so Glenorchy voters now have a formal determination to weigh when judging his fitness for office.
  • The report describes a workplace pattern repeated over several months, with female staff reportedly distressed by the interactions.
  • The case is a test of Tasmania's local government code of conduct process and what happens when an elected member is found to have breached it.

Background

Glenorchy is a municipality in southern Tasmania adjoining Hobart. Under Tasmania's local government framework, council members, known as aldermen, are bound by a code of conduct, and complaints can be investigated by panels that publish determinations. This report is one such determination, arising from a complaint by the council's former chief executive.

Key Perspectives

The code of conduct panel: Found Alderman Ridler breached the code repeatedly and said the behaviour showed a lack of awareness of proper conduct in modern Australian society. Tony McMullen, former chief executive: Made the complaint after female workers told him they were distressed by interactions with Alderman Ridler. Alderman Peter Ridler: The panel dismissed some allegations against him, including claims of bullying and breaches relating to expressing personal views, though the core findings about his behaviour with female staff were upheld.

What to Watch

  • Whether Alderman Ridler addresses the findings during the re-election campaign.
  • Whether the council takes further action in response to the panel's determination.
  • Whether the report prompts wider scrutiny of workplace culture at the council.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe