Launceston mayor defends $17,000 credit card spend on cocktails, AirPods and KFC

Matthew Garwood says context matters, items were for official council business

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Launceston Mayor Matthew Garwood has defended spending more than $17,000 on a work-issued credit card over three years, after documents obtained under Right to Information laws revealed purchases including Apple AirPods, Tommy Hilfiger shirts, KFC and hundreds of dollars worth of cocktails.

Documents obtained under Right to Information laws and reviewed by the ABC show the elected official spending on items such as Apple AirPods, Tommy Hilfiger shirts, and numerous Uber Eats purchases.

Some of the larger charges included a night at Launceston bar Midnight Rambler, where $1,750 was spent on cocktails in December 2023. In November 2024, Cr Garwood settled a $415.08 tab at a Canberra steakhouse, which included almost $200 on steaks, four cocktails and a $52 bottle of cabernet sauvignon.

Spending in November 2025 during a trip to Japan incurred one of the highest sums of nearly $2,500 and included food delivery and transport expenses. Other food delivery orders included a $61.24 expense for KFC, delivered by Uber Eats in September 2025, and $83.75 for a four-person McDonald's bundle meal in the same month. More drink charges appeared in September, including $50 on an espresso martini and a Long Island iced tea.

The City of Launceston's councillor's expenses and resources policy outlines specific rules as to what is acceptable expenditure. Meals are claimable for reimbursement when attending council business such as a conference, function or event where the meal is not provided as part of legislation, or a council event that requires overnight stay and meals are not provided at the venue, the policy states. Each claim must also clearly identify the purpose, in order to make clear the basis of the claim and its relation to the policy guidelines.

Taking to social media, Cr Garwood hit back at the implication he misused council funds, saying context matters. The reported expenditure is covering travel, official functions, meetings, hosting, meals and equipment used in the role, he said. This isn't a secret credit card operating without oversight.

Cr Garwood said the Tommy Hilfiger polo shirts were branded shirts given to delegates for the tour of Japan and that he chose long sleeves to cover his tattoos to be mindful of Japanese culture. The AirPods, also for the overseas tour, were purchased for their translation function, Cr Garwood said. Anything purchased for council business belongs to council, he said.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The spending raises questions about what constitutes appropriate use of taxpayer-funded council credit cards, especially for discretionary items like cocktails and fast food
  • It highlights transparency issues in local government expenditure, with documents only obtained through Right to Information laws
  • The mayor's term expires this year, making the timing politically significant for Launceston residents

Background

Local government credit card policies typically aim to cover legitimate business expenses such as travel, accommodation and meals directly related to council duties. The City of Launceston's policy requires clear identification of the purpose for each claim. This case comes as councils across Australia face increasing scrutiny over spending practices.

Key Perspectives

Mayor Matthew Garwood: Defends the spending as legitimate council business covering travel, official functions, meetings and equipment. He argues context matters and that the card is not a secret, operating without oversight. Launceston Ratepayers: May be concerned about the nature of expenses, particularly personal-looking items like cocktail tabs and fast food deliveries, even if technically within policy. Critics/Skeptics: Will question whether items like AirPods for translation, branded Tommy Hilfiger shirts and expensive cocktail tabs are necessary or appropriate for a council role, even if purchased under policy guidelines.

What to Watch

  • Whether the council's expenses policy is reviewed or tightened following public disclosure
  • Any formal complaint or investigation into the spending
  • Impact on the mayor's political position as his term expires this year

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.