Lean proof assistant generates step-level labels to train natural-language proof verifiers.

A verifier trained on 10,634 Lean-labeled proofs outperforms human-annotated verifiers on multiple benchmarks, achieving 74.7% step-label accuracy.

Academic
Rodney Lafuente-Mercado · Salman Rahman · Jingyan Shen · James Shiffer · Saadia Gabriel · Pavel Izmailov

University of Texas at Austin · University of California, Los Angeles · New York University

Research Digest··3 min read
The authors introduce LeanPRM, a framework that uses the Lean proof assistant to generate step-level correctness labels for natural-language proofs without human annotation.

LeanPRM works by having a language model produce a natural-language proof together with a corresponding Lean formal proof in a single autoregressive pass, without any feedback from the proof assistant.

Why this paper

From University of Texas at Austin and 2 others

In one line

Lean-generated step labels train better natural-language proof verifiers than human labels, without human annotation.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors (2 noted)
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks (3 benchmarks)

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe