Live clocks reverse which language-model agents perform best in games

RealtimeBench shows that inference delays can erase reasoning advantages, while offline teacher guidance can improve a fast agent during live play.

Big Tech
Ningxin Pan · Hanyu Li · Yeqing Shen · Ning Ding · Yehui Tang · Wentao Zhang

Peking University · Samsung Research, Beijing, China

Research Digest··2 min read
Pan and colleagues evaluate language-model agents in games that continue changing while models reason, exposing costs hidden when environments pause for each response.

The authors built RealtimeBench, comprising 180 tasks across six game types, including Mario, Snake and Tetris.

Why this paper

From Samsung Research, Beijing, China and Peking University · Part of Benchmark Ecological Validity, now 12 papers

In one line

Under a live clock, stronger slow reasoning loses to fast responses unless its insights are distilled offline into reusable instructions for a fast actor.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe