Maduro denies new torture allegations in New York court appearance

Deposed Venezuelan president and wife Cilia Flores plead not guilty to charges of leading state-sponsored torture campaign

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Deposed Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro appeared in a New York court on Thursday to face rewritten drug trafficking and torture indictments, calling the allegations 'false accusations' as the judge entered a not-guilty plea on his behalf.

Maduro, shackled at the ankles, was brought before US District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in Manhattan following a revised indictment that accuses him and his wife, Cilia Flores, of leading a state-sponsored campaign of repression that included torture of victims, including three Americans. The judge entered a not-guilty plea for Maduro after he twice responded to the request to enter a plea by criticising the indictment. Flores, 70, said through an interpreter: 'I am completely innocent. I am not guilty.'

According to the rewritten indictment, Maduro oversaw a torture system that beat, asphyxiated and delivered electric shocks to victims. He is accused of personally recommending torture methods, receiving updates on specific victims' treatment and threatening to kill a prisoner's child as psychological torture. Flores, a former attorney general, allegedly helped develop the repressive system and ordered the torture of specific people.

Maduro and Flores were seized from their Caracas home in a night-time raid by US military forces in January. They had previously pleaded not guilty in a separate US drug case that alleged they conspired to flood the United States with cocaine. Their attorneys argue the cases should be dismissed on immunity grounds because they were the leader and first lady of a foreign country.

Prosecutors told the judge that both sides want the trial date moved from 1 June to 14 June. Torture is a crime under international law that can be prosecuted outside the country where abuse occurred. The prosecution of foreign officials in the US is rare but has been attempted in cases involving the son of former Liberian president Charles Taylor, Russians responsible for war crimes in Ukraine, and a former prison warden in Bashar al-Assad's Syria.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case marks a rare US prosecution of a foreign head of state, testing international norms of sovereign immunity.
  • The torture allegations cover abuses stretching from Maduro's rise to power in 2013 to his capture, affecting numerous victims including Americans.
  • The trial outcome could set a precedent for future prosecutions of foreign leaders in US courts.

Background

Nicolas Maduro served as Venezuela's president from 2013, succeeding his mentor Hugo Chavez. Following years of economic collapse and political repression, he was captured by US forces in a January raid on his Caracas home. He has been under investigation by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity but has consistently denied wrongdoing. The latest indictment adds torture charges to existing drug trafficking allegations, which the couple has also pleaded not guilty to.

Key Perspectives

Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores: Deny the accusations and claim immunity as a foreign head of state and first lady. Their attorney, Barry Pollack, said Maduro 'looks forward to his day in court.' US Department of Justice: Pursues prosecution under universal jurisdiction for torture, arguing crimes against international law can be tried in the US. International law experts: Note that prosecuting foreign official is rare but legally possible under the Torture Victim Protection Act and other statutes. The immunity argument will be a central legal battle.

What to Watch

  • The judge's ruling on the immunity motion, which could determine whether the case proceeds.
  • The trial date shift from June 1 to June 14, indicating both sides are preparing.
  • Whether additional victims or evidence emerge as the case develops.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe