Models confuse rejected proposals with active instructions in dialogue

Intent-Eval shows that language models often act on requirements that users rejected or replaced, while decision-conditioned self-distillation reduces the resulting errors.

Chinese Tech
Junle Chen · Wei Chen · Zhengjun Huang · Zhoujin Tian · Yuxuan Liu · Kai Wang · +2 more

HKUST · Tencent Hy

Research Digest··2 min read
Chen et al.

The authors created Intent-Eval, comprising 414 tasks and 3,312 evaluation instances across tool actions, code, databases and mathematics.

Why this paper

From Tencent Hy and HKUST

In one line

Models treat mentioned but rejected changes as still active, degrading accuracy in multi-turn tasks.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.