Mullin sees no propaganda risk in livestreaming Fort Hood shooter's execution

Trump says he may reconsider as criticism grows over plan to broadcast firing squad

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources4 outlets
US Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has defended the planned livestreaming of Nidal Hasan's execution, dismissing warnings that footage of the former army major's death by firing squad could be used as propaganda by violent groups.

Speaking on CBS News' Face the Nation on Sunday, Mullin framed the broadcast as part of President Donald Trump's hardline approach to crime. "I follow President Trump. He's a commander-in chief of the country," Mullin said, crediting Trump with "restoring America values". Asked about the risk of the images being exploited, Mullin said: "I don't see an elevated risk at this point at all because of this. I think people need to understand, if you attack America, we will come after you, and we will make sure that the punishment fits the crime." He also dismissed concerns about broadcasting the killing of a man in a wheelchair, saying: "Once again, no one has to watch it if they don't choose to."

Hasan, a former US Army major, was sentenced to death in August 2013 after being convicted of killing 12 unarmed active-duty soldiers and a retired serviceman at Fort Hood, Texas. The attack, on November 5, 2009, at a medical facility where troops receive pre-deployment check-ups, is considered one of the deadliest mass shootings on a US military base. A further 32 people were injured, and police shot Hasan, leaving him paralysed from the waist down.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the plan to livestream the execution last week, triggering a wave of criticism. The Pope has called the death penalty "inadmissible", and US lawmakers have condemned the plan as "barbaric". Trump said on Saturday he may reconsider, telling reporters outside the White House: "There are two thoughts: Don't show it and show it. Because, you know, by showing it, maybe other people won't be doing what he did." He said he would make the final decision, knowing "what the military would like to do". The execution is scheduled for December 3.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The decision to broadcast a federal execution raises unresolved legal and ethical questions about state killing and public spectacle.
  • It is part of the Trump administration's broader hardline approach to crime, tested against warnings that the footage could be turned into propaganda.
  • With the execution scheduled for December 3, there is a short window for the president to change course or for courts to intervene.

Background

Nidal Hasan, a former US Army psychiatrist, opened fire at Fort Hood's medical facility in 2009, killing 13 people and wounding 32. He was convicted and sentenced to death in 2013. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the livestream plan last week, and it quickly drew international criticism. The administration has framed the broadcast as a demonstration that attacks on America will be punished.

Key Perspectives

The administration: Mullin sees no elevated propaganda risk and argues the broadcast shows that those who attack America will face punishment that fits the crime. Hegseth announced the plan. Critics: US lawmakers have called the plan "barbaric" and the Pope has called the death penalty "inadmissible", with concerns focused on the spectacle and the image of a paralysed man being executed by firing squad. President Trump: He says he is weighing two thoughts: that showing the execution may deter others, and that it may not be appropriate. He has said he will make the final decision.

What to Watch

  • Whether Trump follows through with the livestream or orders the military to change course before December 3.
  • Any legal challenges to the broadcast, including questions over whether livestreaming an execution is permissible.
  • Reaction from the families of the victims and from international observers concerned about the propaganda value of the footage.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe