Netanyahu pledges to overthrow Iran's government, but analysts question viability

Israeli PM declares regime change a 'primary objective' days before national elections, yet experts point to lack of strategy and uncertain US support

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time3 min
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that toppling Iran's government remains his 'primary objective,' speaking days before national elections as his poll numbers slide. The declaration followed conversations with US President Donald Trump and a visit by Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, but no indication emerged that Washington has agreed to join another offensive against Iran, let alone a campaign to bring down its leadership.

Netanyahu's remarks, reported by Al Jazeera, come nearly 30 years after he first labelled Iran a primary threat in a 1996 address to the US Congress. US participation in a June 2025 war and a campaign launched on February 28 this year delivered the military intervention he had long sought, but the overthrow of Iran's government did not follow.

Analysts are sceptical that air strikes alone can achieve regime change. Urban Coningham, a research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, told Al Jazeera that while Israel has the firepower to establish air superiority and strike targets, it lacks a clear strategy for translating military gains into political change. Caglar Kurc, an assistant professor at Abdullah Gul University, said bombing can degrade military capabilities but cannot fully destroy offensive capabilities, and overthrowing the government would require a willingness to deploy troops and remain on the ground for years.

The question of US backing remains pivotal. The Financial Times reported this week that an Israeli proposal for renewed strikes failed to secure Trump's approval, though it suggested disagreement over timing rather than a flat rejection. Without US participation, Israel would lack the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker-busting bombs that US B-2 bombers used on Iran's Fordow and Natanz nuclear facilities in June 2025.

Iran, meanwhile, retains the capacity to retaliate. Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at RUSI, said Iran likely still has sizeable stocks of missiles, and its antiship missile stockpiles remain large because they are comparatively easy to make and Iran's southern mountains provide natural shelter. Coningham noted that Israel's interceptor stocks have been drawn down in previous exchanges, and repeated attacks impose a financial burden as the country intercepts inexpensive Iranian drones with far more costly defensive weapons.

Analysts also dismissed the prospect that Kurdish or Baloch armed groups could provide the ground force needed to challenge the state. Coningham said Kurdish groups lacked the military capabilities to take on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Netanyahu himself acknowledged the limits of airpower in March, saying, 'You can't do it only from the air. There has to be a ground component, as well,' without explaining what that would involve.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Another Israeli offensive against Iran risks drawing the United States into a wider Middle East conflict, especially if Gulf states hosting US assets are targeted.
  • Iran retains missile stocks and the ability to retaliate against Israel and regional neighbours, potentially disrupting oil shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
  • The outcome of Israel's elections next week could affect the trajectory of the conflict; Netanyahu is facing declining support in the polls.

Background

Netanyahu has portrayed Iran as an existential threat since his first term as prime minister in 1996. After years of covert operations and cyberattacks, Israel and the US conducted major military campaigns against Iran in June 2025 and February 2026, striking nuclear facilities at Fordow and Natanz. However, those offensives did not lead to regime change. Netanyahu's latest call for overthrow comes as he campaigns for re-election with diminished public support and as the Trump administration faces pressure to avoid renewed escalation before US midterm elections.

Key Perspectives

Netanyahu and the Israeli government: They argue that regime change is the only way to eliminate the threat from Iran, and that military force remains necessary to achieve this objective. Netanyahu has said airpower alone cannot do it and a ground component would be needed. Military analysts and experts: They express deep scepticism. Even with superior airpower, Israel lacks the ground forces to occupy and control Iran. Covert operations and support for Kurdish groups are unlikely to succeed. Without US bunker-buster bombs, deeply buried facilities may remain safe. The United States: Washington's participation is uncertain. The Financial Times reported that Trump has not approved renewed strikes, and experts note that the administration is wary of another conflict ahead of midterm elections. US backing is unlikely unless a credible path to regime change emerges.

What to Watch

  • Whether Netanyahu wins re-election next week and, if so, whether he presses ahead with a new military plan despite US reluctance.
  • The outcome of US midterm elections and how that affects the Trump administration's appetite for additional Middle East engagements.
  • Any public indication from Iran of new missile deployments or retaliation exercises that could signal readiness to absorb or respond to strikes.

Sources

Checked

11 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 8 supported.

Show each claim
  1. Partly supportedNetanyahu said toppling Iran’s government remains his “primary objective.”Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Netanyahu has said that overthrowing Iran’s government remains Israel’s “primary objective””
  2. Partly supportedNetanyahu pledged to overthrow Iran’s government.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Netanyahu has said that overthrowing Iran’s government remains Israel’s “primary objective””
  3. SupportedNetanyahu made the remarks days before national elections while his poll numbers were sliding.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “as he faces declining support in the polls before national elections next week.”
  4. SupportedNetanyahu’s remarks followed conversations with Trump and a visit by Pete Hegseth.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “His remarks came after conversations with United States President Donald Trump on Sunday and a visit to Israel by Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth.”
  5. Partly supportedNetanyahu’s 1996 address to the US Congress labelled Iran a primary threat.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Addressing the US Congress that July, he said, “The most dangerous of these regimes is Iran, that has wed a cruel despotism to a fanatic militancy.””
  6. SupportedUS participation in the June 2025 war and the campaign launched on February 28 this year delivered the military intervention Netanyahu had long sought.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Nearly 30 years later, US participation in the June 2025 war, and again in the campaign launched on February 28 this year, delivered the military intervention Netanyahu had long sought.”
  7. SupportedAnalysts are sceptical that air strikes alone can achieve regime change, and say Israel lacks a clear strategy for turning military gains into political change.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “analysts told Al Jazeera, it lacks a clear strategy for translating military gains into the overthrow of Iran’s government. Air strikes alone are unlikely to achieve that objective”
  8. SupportedKurc said overthrowing the government would require deploying troops and remaining on the ground for years.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Overthrowing the government, Kurc said, would require a willingness to deploy troops and remain on the ground for years.”
  9. SupportedThe Financial Times reported that an Israeli proposal for renewed strikes failed to secure Trump’s approval, with disagreement apparently about timing rather than a flat rejection.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “The Financial Times reported this week that an Israeli proposal for renewed strikes had failed to secure Trump’s approval, although it suggested disagreement about immediate action rather than Washington ruling out future attacks altogether.”
  10. SupportedWithout US participation, Israel would lack the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bombs used by US B-2 bombers on Fordow and Natanz in June 2025.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Without Trump’s participation, Coningham said, Israel would lack US capabilities for striking deeply buried facilities. These include the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker-busting bombs that US B-2 bombers dropped on Iran’s Fordow and Natanz nuclear facilities in June 2025.”
  11. SupportedNetanyahu said, “You can't do it only from the air. There has to be a ground component, as well,” in March.Al Jazeera – Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera: “Netanyahu himself acknowledged the limits of airpower in March, saying, “You can’t do it only from the air.” “There has to be a ground component, as well,” he added”

Zotpaper

Written by Rex Doyle on the World desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 source8 of 11 claims matched to a sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe