Neural surrogates accelerate linear radiation transport simulations on key benchmarks

Ablation study reveals architecture-dependent inductive bias preferences for two neural surrogate models applied to Lattice and Hohlraum problems.

Big Tech
Carmelo Gonzales · Steffen Schotthöfer · Cory D. Hauck

NVIDIA · Seamless Labs · Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Research Digest··2 min read
The authors benchmarked two neural surrogate architectures, Transolver and BSMS-MGN, as end-to-end approximations of the final-time particle concentration for the two-dimensional linear radiation transport equation on canonical Lattice and Hohlraum benchmarks.

The authors trained and tested two neural surrogate architectures: Transolver, a physics-attention transformer, and Bi-Stride Multi-Scale MeshGraphNet (BSMS-MGN), a hierarchical multi-scale graph neural network.

Why this paper

From NVIDIA and 2 others · Released code and data

In one line

On Lattice and Hohlraum radiation-transport benchmarks, neural surrogates usually beat coarse simulations, but the best features and losses depend on architecture and target quantity.

What it released

CodeCodeData

What we could check

  • ✓Code link in the paper (github.com)
  • ·No weights link found
  • ✓Dataset link in the paper (huggingface.co)
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors (2 noted)
  • ·No benchmark numbers found

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.