The NRL's approach to penalising hip-drop tackles has come under renewed scrutiny after two similar incidents led to vastly different outcomes, writes journalist and author Malcolm Knox.
Knox contrasts the tackle by Crossland that shattered Cleary's leg with the tackle by Radley on Farnworth, which earned nothing more than a penalty. The difference, according to the column, lies in the league's policy of using the injury suffered by the recipient as an aggravating factor when determining grading.
Knox cites the previous case of Sharks playmaker Nicho Hynes, who had a hip-drop charge downgraded from a grade 2 to a grade 1 last year after Canterbury's doctor advised the injury to Marcelo Montoya was not as serious as first feared. This freed Hynes to play in a sudden-death final against the Roosters.
The opinion piece argues this focus on consequences rather than conduct leaves the league open to criticism, stating it "leaves the NRL in danger of snookering itself via the inconsistency in sanctions for very similar offences". Knox notes the disparity also provides fuel for conspiracy theorists who believe the Roosters benefit from favouritism. The column contrasts the impact on Penrith's premiership hopes with the relative leniency shown to the Roosters.