NSW authorities bury homeless in unmarked communal graves, families left in the dark

Guardian investigation finds at least 18 clients of Sydney homelessness services placed in unmarked plots since 2016, despite 2013 promise to mark graves

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
An investigation by Guardian Australia has revealed that New South Wales authorities repeatedly buried homeless individuals in unmarked communal graves without notifying their families, despite a 2013 undertaking to mark such plots. The case of Roger Davies, a rough sleeper whose body lay undiscovered in an abandoned Sydney house for three years, highlights systemic failures in the state's burial process for those deemed unable to afford a funeral.

In a quiet corner of Rookwood Cemetery in western Sydney, a grassed walkway runs between rows of old headstones. The grass is kept trimmed, but there is nothing to indicate what lies beneath. In October 2015, Roger Davies and four others were buried there in a communal plot by the New South Wales government. The four strangers were deemed unable to afford their own funeral, a designation that gave the state responsibility for their remains.

Davies was a rough sleeper whose body was found in 2015, three years after his death. A postmortem found fractures to nine ribs around the time of his death, but police decided there was no evidence of suspicious circumstances and concluded he had overdosed. No drug paraphernalia was reportedly found with him.

Police knew Davies was from Adelaide and had the names and dates of birth of his brother and sister, but documents suggest they first contacted South Australian authorities for a family contact number on 20 November 2017. By then, Davies had already been buried. His sister, Chantel Dubsky, learned of his death only after the burial.

"There was no closure, there's never going to be any closure," Dubsky told the Guardian. "And up until now with you, there's no one who's cared."

Dubsky said she would have had her brother cremated and returned to Adelaide to be laid to rest with his mother and grandparents. "It's unspeakable. He shouldn't be there in the first place," she said.

The government did not mark his grave, despite a 2013 promise to do so. A three-month Guardian investigation found at least 18 clients of Sydney homelessness services have been placed in unmarked communal graves since 2016. Leaders in the homelessness sector say they were not informed of these burials.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The practice denies families the opportunity to bury their loved ones with dignity and according to their wishes.
  • It highlights systemic failures in how the NSW government handles the remains of people experiencing homelessness.
  • The lack of notification and unmarked graves prevent closure for grieving families.

Background

The NSW government has a legal obligation to make reasonable efforts to contact next of kin before burying individuals who cannot afford a funeral. A 2013 promise to mark communal graves appears to have gone unfulfilled. The Guardian's investigation used cemetery registries, satellite imagery, and testimony from homelessness workers to uncover the pattern.

Key Perspectives

[Family of the deceased]: Chantel Dubsky says she was robbed of the chance to give her brother a proper funeral and burial with family. Her sons feel they were denied the opportunity to know their uncle. [NSW government]: The government has not commented on the specific cases. The 2013 promise to mark graves suggests an awareness of the issue, but enforcement appears lacking. [Homelessness sector leaders]: They were not informed when clients were buried, preventing them from offering support or contacting relatives.

What to Watch

  • Whether the NSW government responds to the findings and takes steps to contact families before burials.
  • Any future commitment to marking existing unmarked graves.
  • Potential legislative or policy changes to ensure notification protocols are followed.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe