Friday 9 October 2026
Afternoon EditionRSS
ZOTPAPER

News without the noise

ZOTPAPER
Sydney

NSW government takes control of City of Sydney's Town Hall square plan

Planning Minister declares $150 million project state-significant, bypassing council approval

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
The Minns government has wrested control of the City of Sydney's decades-long plan to demolish seven inner-city buildings for a public square, after the NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC) advised the project was of state significance. Planning Minister Paul Scully will use his powers under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act to declare the $150 million development state-significant, shifting assessment from the council to the state.

The long-vaunted Town Hall square project has been in planning for years and involves knocking down seven buildings near Sydney Town Hall to create a public plaza. The City of Sydney has argued the space is essential to address a lack of public open space in the city centre.

Planning Minister Paul Scully intervened in September, referring the project to the IPC for advice. On Friday, he announced the commission had recommended state-level assessment after considering information from the City of Sydney and the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. The project's cost and prominent location were factors in the decision.

"The proposal will be delegated to the Independent Planning Commission for determination, should the City of Sydney submit a state-significant development application," Scully said. "This process will allow for a rigorous whole-of-government assessment by the department and provide an opportunity for individuals, the community and other stakeholders to have their say."

Lord Mayor Clover Moore has defended the project, describing more public space as "not a nice-to-have, it is essential infrastructure". The council's plan has been divisive, with debate over the demolition of existing buildings and the cost of the square.

The IPC will ultimately decide whether the project proceeds, if the City of Sydney lodges a state-significant development application. The government's intervention bypasses the usual council approval process for developments of this type.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The decision strips the City of Sydney of planning control over a major public space project in the CBD, testing the balance between local and state government authority.
  • The outcome will determine whether Sydney gains a new public square in an area with limited open space, or whether the project stalls or is rejected.
  • The $150 million cost and long timeline mean taxpayers and ratepayers have a direct stake in the result.

Background

The Town Hall square plan has been in development for decades. The City of Sydney proposed demolishing seven buildings near the historic Town Hall to create a plaza. Critics have questioned the cost and the loss of existing built fabric. The project has been the subject of community consultation and design iterations. In September 2026, Planning Minister Paul Scully referred it to the Independent Planning Commission for advice on whether it should be treated as state-significant development.

Key Perspectives

NSW Government (Planning Minister Paul Scully): The project's cost and prominent location make it a matter of state significance. State-level assessment ensures rigorous whole-of-government consideration and public input. City of Sydney (Lord Mayor Clover Moore): More public space in the city centre is essential infrastructure. The council has spent years developing the plan and argues it will benefit residents, workers and visitors. Critics/Skeptics: The plan has been divisive. Some question whether demolishing seven buildings for a square is the best use of funds, while others raise concerns about heritage and the impact on surrounding businesses.

What to Watch

  • Whether the City of Sydney submits a state-significant development application to the Independent Planning Commission.
  • The timeline for the IPC's assessment and determination, which could take months.
  • Community and stakeholder submissions during the assessment process, which may influence the final decision.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe