NSW Premier intervenes to save Hunter Valley coal mine jobs after High Court ruling on climate emissions

Government gives MACH Energy legislated approval for expansion despite High Court finding invalid due to scope 3 emissions

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time3 min
Sources6 outlets
The New South Wales government will legislate to approve an expansion of the Mount Pleasant coal mine in the Hunter Valley, overriding a High Court ruling that found the original approval invalid for failing to consider emissions from exported coal. Premier Chris Minns announced the intervention on Monday, saying the move was necessary to prevent about 400 job losses before Christmas.

Premier Chris Minns announced on Monday that the NSW government would step in to give MACH Energy legislated approval to increase production at the Mount Pleasant coal mine to 16.5 million tonnes a year, from its current limit of 12.5 million tonnes, until 2032. The decision came after MACH Energy told the government it was preparing to sack half its workforce – about 400 people – before Christmas if its approval was not expanded.

In return for boosting the mine's annual production limit, the government said the company had agreed to sign a jobs guarantee that would establish a legal obligation to maintain staffing levels.

The intervention follows a High Court ruling a fortnight ago that a 2022 approval by the NSW Independent Planning Commission was invalid because it had failed to properly consider the climate impact of coal exported overseas from the mine. The ruling – which found the IPC had not properly considered the impact of so-called "scope 3 emissions" – led to immediate calls from the Coalition and One Nation for Labor to urgently pass new laws overruling the High Court.

Speaking on Monday, Minns acknowledged the difficulty of the decision. "These are not easy decisions," he said. "They're incredibly difficult, and I've agonised over this one." He said the government had to balance climate goals against protecting jobs: "We have to approach these things in a commonsense way and draw conclusions so that we're making progress towards our climate goals, while at the same time not tipping hundreds and hundreds of families onto the scrap heap weeks before Christmas."

NSW Natural Resources Minister Courtney Houssos said the new legislation would include requirements to limit scope 3 emissions in line with the IPC's recent Hunter Valley Operations mine approval. In effect, the company can only export coal to countries that are signatories to the Paris climate agreement.

The decision sparked immediate backlash from environmental groups. Greens MP Sue Higginson said Labor had capitulated to "threats and taken the side of the billionaire coal company over the community". "This is an incredible new low for the Minns Labor government, bypassing the planning process and the law as laid down by the High Court of Australia," she said.

Lock the Gate national co-ordinator Georgina Woods called it "cynical and dangerous political interference in the planning system", accusing Labor of "manufacturing a crisis to give special treatment to a coal company". She noted that the mine already had approval to stay open for another six years, arguing there was no threat to jobs.

Minns denied the government was undermining independent planning rules, saying the impact of the High Court judgment on MACH Energy's expansion would still need to be worked out in the lower courts. He described the move as a "partial approval to keep pace with the current workforce that's on the ground in that community". Asked if the government would have made the same decision if an election was not looming, Minns said he believed it would have, pointing to the government's record on protecting jobs in the Hunter Valley.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The decision tests the NSW government's commitment to climate action and independent planning processes after a landmark High Court ruling on scope 3 emissions.
  • It sets a precedent for how other coal mine approvals could be handled, potentially reopening a wave of legal challenges.
  • The move highlights the tension between climate policy and regional employment, particularly in electorally sensitive Hunter Valley seats.

Background

The High Court ruling a fortnight ago found that the NSW Independent Planning Commission's 2022 approval for the Mount Pleasant mine expansion was invalid because it failed to consider greenhouse gas emissions from coal exported overseas (scope 3 emissions). The ruling applied only to that specific approval but raised questions about other mining approvals. The Minns government initially played down the need for legislative change but reversed course after MACH Energy warned of immediate job losses.

Key Perspectives

NSW Government (Premier Chris Minns): The decision is a commonsense compromise that protects 400 jobs while still moving towards climate goals. The new legislation will require exports only to Paris Agreement signatories, limiting emissions. Environmental Groups and The Greens: The government has caved to a billionaire coal company, bypassed the law, and undermined the independent planning system. They argue the job threat was manufactured since the mine can operate for years under existing approvals. Coalition and One Nation: They had called for legislation to overrule the High Court decision entirely, arguing it creates uncertainty for the mining industry.

What to Watch

  • The passage of the legislation through the NSW parliament, where Labor may need crossbench support.
  • Whether MACH Energy follows through on the jobs guarantee and maintains staffing levels.
  • Potential legal challenges from environmental groups against the new legislation.

Sources

Checked

12 claims in this story checked against 1 source: 12 supported.

Show each claim
  1. SupportedNSW Premier intervenes to save Hunter Valley coal mine jobs after High Court ruling on climate emissionsWA Today - Latest News: “Premier Chris Minns announced on Monday that the NSW government would step in to give MACH Energy legislated approval to increase production at the Mount Pleasant coal mine”
  2. SupportedGovernment gives MACH Energy legislated approval for expansion despite High Court finding invalid due to scope 3 emissionsWA Today - Latest News: “the High Court ruled a fortnight ago that a 2022 approval by the NSW Independent Planning Commission was invalid because it had failed to properly consider the climate impact of coal exported overseas from the mine”
  3. SupportedThe New South Wales government will legislate to approve an expansion of the Mount Pleasant coal mine in the Hunter Valley, overriding a High Court ruling that found the original approval invalid for failing to consider emissions from exported coal.WA Today - Latest News: “the High Court ruled a fortnight ago that a 2022 approval by the NSW Independent Planning Commission was invalid because it had failed to properly consider the climate impact of coal exported overseas from the mine”
  4. SupportedPremier Chris Minns announced on Monday that the NSW government would step in to give MACH Energy legislated approval to increase production at the Mount Pleasant coal mine to 16.5 million tonnes a year, from its current limit of 12.5 million tonnes, until 2032.WA Today - Latest News: “Premier Chris Minns announced on Monday that the NSW government would step in to give MACH Energy legislated approval to increase production at the Mount Pleasant coal mine to 16.5 million tonnes a year, from its current limit of 12.5 million tonnes, until 2032.”
  5. SupportedThe decision came after MACH Energy told the government it was preparing to sack half its workforce – about 400 people – before Christmas if its approval was not expanded.WA Today - Latest News: “Minns said the decision came after MACH Energy told the government it was preparing to sack half its workforce – about 400 people – before Christmas if its approval was not expanded.”
  6. SupportedIn return for boosting the mine's annual production limit, the government said the company had agreed to sign a jobs guarantee that would establish a legal obligation to maintain staffing levels.WA Today - Latest News: “In return for boosting the mine’s annual production limit, the government said the company had agreed to sign a jobs guarantee that would establish a legal obligation to maintain staffing levels.”
  7. SupportedThe intervention follows a High Court ruling a fortnight ago that a 2022 approval by the NSW Independent Planning Commission was invalid because it had failed to properly consider the climate impact of coal exported overseas from the mine.WA Today - Latest News: “The intervention comes after the High Court ruled a fortnight ago that a 2022 approval by the NSW Independent Planning Commission was invalid because it had failed to properly consider the climate impact of coal exported overseas from the mine.”
  8. SupportedMinns said: 'These are not easy decisions... They're incredibly difficult, and I've agonised over this one.' and 'We have to approach these things in a commonsense way and draw conclusions so that we're making progress towards our climate goals, while at the same time not tipping hundreds and hundreds of families onto the scrap heap weeks before Christmas.'WA Today - Latest News: ““These are not easy decisions,” Minns said. “They’re incredibly difficult, and I’ve agonised over this one. ... We have to approach these things in a commonsense way and draw conclusions so that we’re making progress towards our climate goals, while at the same time not tipping hundreds and hundreds of families onto the scrap heap weeks before Christmas.””
  9. SupportedNSW Natural Resources Minister Courtney Houssos said the new legislation would include requirements to limit scope 3 emissions in line with the IPC's recent Hunter Valley Operations mine approval. In effect, the company can only export coal to countries that are signatories to the Paris climate agreement.WA Today - Latest News: “NSW Natural Resources Minister Courtney Houssos said the new legislation ... would include requirements to limit scope 3 emissions in line with the IPC’s recent Hunter Valley Operations mine approval. It means that, in effect, the company can only export coal to countries that are signatories to the Paris climate agreement.”
  10. SupportedGreens MP Sue Higginson said Labor had capitulated to 'threats and taken the side of the billionaire coal company over the community'.WA Today - Latest News: “Greens MP Sue Higginson said Labor had capitulated to “threats and taken the side of the billionaire coal company over the community”.”
  11. SupportedLock the Gate national co-ordinator Georgina Woods called it 'cynical and dangerous political interference in the planning system', accusing Labor of 'manufacturing a crisis to give special treatment to a coal company'. She noted that the mine already had approval to stay open for another six years, arguing there was no threat to jobs.WA Today - Latest News: “Lock the Gate national co-ordinator Georgina Woods called it “cynical and dangerous political interference in the planning system”, accusing Labor of “manufacturing a crisis to give special treatment to a coal company”. “There is no threat to jobs at Mount Pleasant, which already has approval to stay open for another six years,” she said.”
  12. SupportedMinns denied the government was undermining independent planning rules, saying the impact of the High Court judgment on MACH Energy's expansion would still need to be worked out in the lower courts. He described the move as a 'partial approval to keep pace with the current workforce that's on the ground in that community'.WA Today - Latest News: “Minns denied the government was undermining rules around the independent assessment of mines, saying the impact of the High Court judgment on MACH Energy’s expansion would still need to be worked out in the lower courts. He called it a “partial approval to keep pace with the current workforce that’s on the ground in that community”.”

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the Australia & local desk. Claims checked by Ines Fairley, verification. Read for legal risk by Marcus Hale, legal. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

2 sources12 of 12 claims matched to a sourcefirst published 19 Oct, 2:43 pm
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe