OpenAI opens Decisions API to public beta with image inputs

Priced at $0.10 per million input tokens, as Perplexity, Cloudflare and Amazon release rival decision models

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
OpenAI has opened its Decisions API to public beta and added image inputs that let applications make fast decisions from visual content. The API, first announced last week and widely seen as a response to TypeSafe's Jev, is priced at $0.10 per 1 million input tokens with no output-token charges, and faces a new wave of competing decision models from Perplexity, Cloudflare and Amazon.

OpenAI has opened its Decisions API to public beta and added image inputs that allow applications to make fast decisions from visual content. The API, first announced last week as a likely response to TypeSafe's Jev, is priced at $0.10 per 1 million input tokens, with no output-token charges and no charges for cache reads or writes.

The API runs on GPT-6 Luna and turns text or images into three types of structured outputs: predicates, which gauge how likely something is to be true; choices, which pick the best fit from predefined options; and scores, which place an input on a numeric range.

The image input capabilities are aimed at fast, vision-driven action. OpenAI demonstrates the API navigating a video-game car through traffic, deciding whether to switch lanes or keep driving. The company claims it can make such decisions in a fraction of the time a reasoning model would take.

OpenAI also hints at broader computer-use applications, where the API could take screenshots and quickly select the next action. Its demonstration video features a preview unit of Hugging Face's upcoming Microduck robot, an open-source bipedal developer robot. Paired with GPT-Live, OpenAI's real-time voice model, the Decisions API can analyze the robot's camera frames to decide where it should look. In the example, a command to "follow the apple" prompts the API to identify the fruit and direct the robot toward it, and the pairing can respond to more ambiguous instructions such as "follow the fruit."

OpenAI's model is not the only one in the field. Perplexity, Cloudflare and Amazon all released their own decision models this month, opting for open-weight models that developers can download and run on their own infrastructure.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • OpenAI's input-only pricing structure could change how developers budget for decision-making AI, removing output and cache charges.
  • The decision model category promises fast structured answers, opening new use cases in automation, gaming and robotics.
  • OpenAI's closed API competes directly with open-weight alternatives from Perplexity, Cloudflare and Amazon.

Background

Decision models are a newly prominent class of AI designed to produce fast, structured answers: predictions, category choices or numeric scores, rather than extended reasoning or text generation. TypeSafe's Jev helped establish the category, and OpenAI's API is widely seen as a response. The release this week coincides with a wave of similar models from other vendors.

Key Perspectives

OpenAI: Positions the API as a fast, low-cost route from text or images to structured decisions, pairing it with real-time voice for robotics and computer-use tasks. Perplexity, Cloudflare and Amazon: Offer open-weight decision models developers can self-host, appealing to teams that want control over their own infrastructure and data. Critics and skeptics: The source notes OpenAI was likely responding to a rival's product, and the durability of the decision-model category is unproven. No independent evaluations of the speed or reliability claims are yet available.

What to Watch

  • Developer adoption of the public beta and whether usage leads to pricing changes.
  • How the open-weight rivals from Perplexity, Cloudflare and Amazon compare in performance and cost.
  • Whether OpenAI expands the Decisions API beyond its three current output types.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.