Palestine Action activists used whips and hammers to threaten guards at Bristol arms factory, court hears

Five defendants accused of being part of 'black team' in break-in at Elbit systems factory

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
Five Palestine Action activists brandished whips, hammers and kebab skewers to intimidate security guards during a break-in at an Israel-linked arms factory near Bristol, a court has heard.

Prosecutors allege the defendants were part of a coordinated operation at the Elbit Systems factory in Filton. A so-called “black team,” wearing black jumpsuits, was tasked with overwhelming the facility's security guards. Once the guards were subdued, a “red team,” wearing red jumpsuits, entered the premises and smashed equipment, including drones. The court heard details of the alleged break-in, which targeted a company linked to Israeli defense manufacturing. The five defendants face charges related to the incident. The trial is ongoing.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The case escalates the legal response to direct action protests targeting Israeli-linked defence companies in the UK.
  • The alleged use of weapons by activists raises questions about the limits of protest tactics and public safety.
  • The outcome could influence how UK courts treat coordinated protest actions involving property damage and intimidation.

Background

Palestine Action is a UK-based group that has conducted multiple protests and break-ins at facilities linked to Israeli arms manufacturers, particularly Elbit Systems. The company supplies drones and other equipment used by the Israeli military. This incident occurred at an Elbit factory in Filton, near Bristol.

Key Perspectives

Prosecution: The “black team” allegedly used whips, hammers and kebab skewers to threaten security guards, allowing a “red team” to break in and destroy equipment. Activists and defence: The court has not yet heard the defence's full case, but Palestine Action frames its actions as non-violent direct action against complicity in alleged war crimes. Critics: The alleged violence, even if symbolic, may be seen as crossing a line, endangering guards and undermining lawful protest.

What to Watch

  • The trial's verdict and any subsequent appeals.
  • Whether similar tactics appear in future protests at other defence facilities.
  • Potential changes to security or policing at sites targeted by direct action groups.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.