Pentagon orders firing squad execution for Fort Hood shooter, first such military execution since WWII

Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 soldiers in 2009, receives presidential approval for execution by firing squad

By LineZotpaper
Published
Updated
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
The Pentagon has announced that former US Army major Nidal Malik Hasan, convicted of killing 13 unarmed soldiers at Fort Hood in 2009, will be executed by firing squad — the first military execution by that method since World War Two. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said on social media Monday that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth made the recommendation and President Donald Trump approved it, with the secretary of the Army to set the time and place.

Hasan, a US Army psychiatrist from Virginia, carried out the deadliest non-combat attack on an American military base on 5 November 2009 at Fort Hood, Texas. He fatally shot 13 soldiers in a crowded medical building where deploying troops were awaiting check-ups and vaccines, and injured 32 others. During his 2013 court-martial, Hasan admitted to being the gunman and apologised for "any mistakes", stating he believed he was protecting Muslims and the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Parnell wrote on X: "Judgement day for Hasan has finally come." Hasan is currently one of four inmates on the US military's death row.

Military executions require presidential approval under military law, along with appellate review and a final judgment on legality. The US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces deemed the military death penalty unconstitutional in 1983, but it was reinstated the following year by an executive order under then-President Ronald Reagan.

Death by firing squad is uncommon in the United States. The last such execution at a state level occurred in South Carolina last year — the first use of the method in the US in 15 years. Four other states — Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Utah — also allow firing squads.

The majority of US executions are carried out at the state level, with 27 states, the federal government and the military retaining capital punishment as a legal option.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The execution marks a rare use of the firing squad method in US military history, reigniting debate over capital punishment methods and military justice.
  • For families of the victims, this finally closes a 17-year wait for a sentence that has been under legal review.
  • The case highlights the separate military justice system, which operates differently from civilian death penalty procedures.

Background

Nidal Malik Hasan was a US Army major and psychiatrist who opened fire at Fort Hood, Texas, in November 2009, killing 13 soldiers and wounding 32. During his court-martial in 2013, he admitted the attack and said he sought to protect Muslim fighters in Afghanistan. He was sentenced to death. The military death penalty has been legally contested; it was ruled unconstitutional in 1983 but reinstated the following year. Four inmates currently sit on military death row. Firing squad executions are rare: before South Carolina last year, none had been conducted in the US for 15 years.

Key Perspectives

Victims' families and survivors: Many have waited for final justice. Some may support the execution, while others may oppose the firing squad method as brutal. Military justice system: The Pentagon and Secretary of War have pushed for execution, seeing it as a necessary culmination of the court-martial process. Death penalty opponents: Critics argue that the firing squad method is archaic and inhumane, and that lengthy appeals have already cast doubt on the reliability of capital punishment.

What to Watch

  • The date and location set by the secretary of the Army.
  • Possible last-minute legal challenges, including appeals on grounds of the method's constitutionality.
  • Reactions from the five states that still allow firing squads, which may influence broader debate about execution methods.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.