The bill, considered the most significant energy legislation in years, would cut hurdles for both fossil fuel and renewable energy projects. A new analysis from Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy projects potentially large time savings, particularly for transmission projects. The analysis, by researcher Jack Andreasen Cavanaugh, estimated how much faster past projects would have proceeded under the new rules.
Supporters include 19 former economic and national security officials from the Carter through Trump administrations. In a letter to congressional leaders, signatories include former Treasury Secretaries Janet Yellen and Steven Mnuchin, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. The letter's organizer, Arnab Datta of the nonpartisan Institute for Progress, said some former officials are engaging with stakeholders and making themselves available for member briefings. "Some folks are engaging beyond the letter itself with stakeholders across the board, and some have made themselves available for members briefings or conversations," Datta said.
But opposition is also emerging. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) argued it would be "tone deaf" to ease building for data centers. Backers counter that the bill includes provisions ensuring data centers cover grid costs. Tribal leaders and some green groups have existing concerns, and the Edison Electric Institute, representing investor-owned utilities, has not taken a position. A document from Oklahoma Gas & Electric obtained by the progressive Energy & Policy Institute criticizes the transmission provisions, according to the group's David Pomerantz.
What's next: The Senate is expected to hold a procedural vote on the bipartisan permitting bill immediately after lawmakers return from recess.