Perth youth crisis accommodation turning away 15 children a day, data shows

Coalition calls for $44.5 million in capital funding as children as young as 12 sleep rough

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources3 outlets
Crisis accommodation services for young people across Perth are rejecting an average of 15 requests for help each day, with children as young as 12 being turned away, according to new data from the Ending Child and Youth Homelessness Coalition. The coalition released its 2027-28 Pre-Budget Submission on Monday, urging the state government to invest in early intervention and new accommodation facilities.

The coalition, a group of not-for-profit organisations, reported that between January and June this year, 19 youth accommodation services across the Perth metropolitan area recorded 2,653 occasions where they could not provide a young person with a place to stay. On average, 69 homeless young people were competing for just 1.83 crisis beds. A growing proportion of those seeking help are employed.

On August 20 alone, 114 unaccompanied young people aged 25 and under were recorded sleeping rough in Perth and Rockingham.

Sector workers described turning away children as young as 12, saying "youth workers watch them walk away, knowing they face unimaginable dangers".

The coalition's pre-budget submission includes five key actions, calling for $2 million per year on early intervention to prevent homelessness, $350,000 to create a dedicated plan to end child and youth homelessness across the state, $44.5 million in capital funding and $6.71 million a year to operate new crisis accommodation in Albany and Bayswater, and $150,000 for a feasibility study in Broome.

Anonymous accounts from those experiencing homelessness described the system as "dehumanising, alienating, and humiliating". One person said they did not want any more referrals because they could not "deal with the feeling of rejection". Another said they "got my hopes up for nothing and left feeling not good enough". Others described "living on the edge", with every day exhausting to survive.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • Hundreds of young people, including children as young as 12, are being left without shelter each month in Perth, facing significant safety risks.
  • The high rate of rejection (69 young people per 1.83 beds) indicates a severe shortage of crisis accommodation that cannot be addressed without major government investment.
  • The coalition's pre-budget submission sets out a clear funding request ahead of the state budget, making this an immediate policy decision point.

Background

Youth homelessness in Western Australia has been a persistent challenge, with limited crisis accommodation options relative to demand. The Ending Child and Youth Homelessness Coalition brings together multiple not-for-profits to advocate for systemic change. Their pre-budget submission is a formal request to the state government, which will deliver its next budget.

Key Perspectives

[Ending Child and Youth Homelessness Coalition]: The coalition argues that a coordinated, well-funded approach can prevent homelessness and provide rapid support. Their five actions include dedicated planning, early intervention spending, and new facilities in Albany and Bayswater. [Sector workers]: Frontline staff report turning away children as young as 12 and watching them walk into dangerous situations, highlighting the emotional toll and the urgent need for more beds. [Government (yet to respond)]: The state government will consider these requests during budget preparations. Decisions on capital funding and ongoing operational costs will determine whether new accommodation is built.

What to Watch

  • The Western Australian state budget: whether the requested $44.5 million in capital funding is allocated.
  • The feasibility study for Broome: if funded, it could indicate expansion beyond the metropolitan area.
  • Ongoing rough-sleeping counts: the August snapshot of 114 young people may increase without intervention.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.