PNG Chiefs welcome High Court ruling; name dispute in holding pattern

New Zealand Rugby's interim injunction bid declined; full trial expected next year

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time2 min
Sources2 outlets
The New Zealand High Court has declined New Zealand Rugby's (NZR) application for an interim injunction to prevent the newly formed PNG Chiefs rugby league franchise from using the 'Chiefs' name. The PNG Chiefs, who are preparing to enter the NRL in 2028, welcomed the ruling, while NZR indicated the decision merely delays the matter until a full hearing. The dispute now enters a holding pattern, with a substantive trial expected next year.

PNG Chiefs CEO Lorna McPherson welcomed the court's decision and said the team looks forward to launching its inaugural logo and supporter jersey in Port Moresby on Wednesday. However, a spokesperson for the franchise declined further comment, citing the ongoing proceedings. The spokesperson was unable to clarify Australian media reports that the NRL and PNG Chiefs have indicated the team would refuse to play matches in New Zealand if ultimately forced to change the name.

Chiefs Rugby CEO Simon Graafhuis told RNZ Pacific that while Friday's decision was not the outcome NZR had hoped for, it does not undermine their case. "I think what it does though is just defers that until the full hearing, which I think all parties sort of agreed needs to happen," he said. Graafhuis expressed concern that the longer the dispute drags on, the greater the risk of brand confusion and damage to all parties.

In her ruling, Justice Karen Grau noted undertakings from the NRL to make efforts to avoid brand confusion in the interim. The core issue for NZR is the dilution of its trademarked brand. The case may also involve legal action in Australia, where NZR holds the trademark. For now, the PNG Chiefs proceed with their launch plans, and the two parties await a full High Court hearing.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The outcome could set a precedent for cross-code trademark disputes in sports.
  • For fans, the uncertainty may affect sponsorship, merchandise, and match scheduling.
  • Reports that the PNG Chiefs might refuse to play in New Zealand could impact NRL fixtures and fan access.

Background

The 'Chiefs' name has long been associated with New Zealand rugby union's Super Rugby team, which holds trademarks in New Zealand and Australia. The PNG Chiefs are a new rugby league franchise set to join the NRL in 2028, backed by the Papua New Guinea government. The overlap in names has led to a legal battle over trademark infringement and brand confusion.

Key Perspectives

PNG Chiefs: The franchise views the name as integral to its identity and has pressed ahead with launch plans, including a jersey reveal. They welcomed the court ruling as validation of their position. NZ Rugby (Chiefs Rugby): NZR argues the dual use dilutes its established brand and creates confusion. They remain confident in their case and seek a timely resolution to minimise damage. Critics and observers: Some note that unresolved reports of the team refusing to play in New Zealand could complicate the NRL's expansion and create further tensions between codes.

What to Watch

  • The full High Court trial, expected next year, which will decide the trademark issue.
  • Potential legal action in Australia by NZR.
  • The PNG Chiefs' launch and how the brand rollout affects public perception and the court's view of confusion.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by Harper Lane on the Business & markets desk. Read for legal risk by Marcus Hale, legal. Edited by Angus Burke, chief sub.

1 sourcefirst published
Meet the newsroomHow we workSubscribe