Private investigator tells Icac he surveilled Liberal minister and supplied recording devices to fugitive developer

By LineZotpaper
Published
Read Time1 min
Sources2 outlets
A private investigator has told the New South Wales Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) that he was instructed to surveil former Liberal minister David Elliott and provided secret recording devices to fugitive property developer Jean Nassif.

Shane De Kauwe gave evidence before Icac on Tuesday, stating that he had installed a static camera on a building to monitor a person connected with Mr Elliott. De Kauwe said his work was commissioned at the direction of Toplace lawyer Sharangan Maheswaran, who asked him to investigate the former minister.

The testimony comes as part of an ongoing corruption inquiry examining links between political figures and the property development sector. Jean Nassif, the founder of the collapsed building giant Toplace, is currently a fugitive. The full scope of De Kauwe's surveillance activities and the nature of the recording devices provided to Nassif remain under investigation.

§

Analysis

Why This Matters

  • The allegations strike at the integrity of elected officials in New South Wales, raising questions about the extent of improper influence between property developers and politicians.
  • The case involves a fugitive developer who has already been central to a major corporate collapse, adding layers of financial and legal complexity.
  • The Icac hearing may lead to further revelations about surveillance tactics used against public figures and could prompt broader scrutiny of political-donor relationships.

Background

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) is New South Wales's primary anti-corruption body, tasked with investigating serious corrupt conduct across the public sector. David Elliott is a former Liberal Party minister who held portfolios including transport and police. Jean Nassif is the founder of Toplace, one of Australia's largest private property development groups, which collapsed in 2022 amid investigations into alleged fraud and a missing $200 million. Nassif has been overseas and is wanted by Australian authorities.

Key Perspectives

Icac: The commission is pursuing whether the surveillance constituted corrupt conduct and whether any public official was improperly influenced. Defence/Legal representatives: Those implicated are likely to argue that the surveillance was lawful or that the allegations are unsubstantiated. No formal response from Mr Elliott or Mr Maheswaran has been reported in the hearing's early stages. Critics/Skeptics: Observers may question the adequacy of existing safeguards against political surveillance and whether Icac has sufficient powers to pursue fugitives and their associates.

What to Watch

  • Whether further witnesses, including Mr Maheswaran, testify about the source and purpose of the surveillance instructions.
  • Any response or statement from David Elliott regarding the allegations.
  • Developments in efforts to extradite or locate Jean Nassif.

Sources

Zotpaper

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.