Probe accuracy has no fixed meaning without a floor and ceiling

Garg proposes anchoring probe scores between a baseline and an information-theoretic ceiling to separate computation from artifact.

Independent
Pranjal Garg
Research Digest··3 min read
Garg introduces a normalization framework for interpretability probes, defining a floor from declared simple inputs and a ceiling from all available information, with the gap between them as the headroom a probe can explain.

Garg formalizes probe interpretation by partitioning available information into a restricted baseline O and additional evidence X used to infer a latent variable Z.

Why this paper

Independent

In one line

Probe scores require normalization against a floor and ceiling to reveal whether a model truly computes beyond simple inputs.

What we could check

  • ·No code link found
  • ·No weights link found
  • ·No dataset link found
  • ·No compute details found
  • ✓Limitations stated by the authors (2 noted)
  • ✓Reports numbers on named benchmarks

Observed from the paper text and links we have. Absence here means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

§

Research Digest

Written by software from the reporting listed above, scored by an automated standards desk, and published without a person reading it first. If something here is wrong, tell the editor and it will be put right.

How we workSubscribe